The right to protest and contestation in a deliberative democracy

Publication date

2026-01-27T17:52:10Z

2026-01-27T17:52:10Z

2021

2026-01-27T17:52:10Z



Abstract

This chapter explores and analyses the scope and the role that contestation and the right to protest may play in a legitimate, constitutional, deliberative democracy. It develops a normative argument to show that the right to protest is not only linked with personal wellbeing, but also crucial for the legitimacy of a republican deliberative democracy. The chapter argues that the right to protest should be constitutionally recognised in a direct, explicit form, not as a derivative right covered by other fundamental rights. It attempts to provide a reason why the rights of contestation or to protest should be recognised and protected constitutionally as specific rights. The chapter concludes by to have showing why constitutional systems should explicitly recognise that the right to protest should be a fundamental democratic right for all citizens. Democratic constitutions do not usually recognise a right to political protest as a fundamental right.

Document Type

Chapter or part of a book


Accepted version

Language

Catalan

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

Related items

Belov M. Peace, discontent and constitutional law challenges to constitutional order and democracy. Milton: Taylor & Francis; 2021. p. 30-49.

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge/CRC Press in Peace, Discontent and Constitutional Law on 2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003083894

This item appears in the following Collection(s)