Recently there has been a renewed interest for probabilistic timing analysis (PTA) and probabilistic task scheduling (PTS). Despite the number of works in both fields, the link between them is weak: works on the latter build upon a series of assumptions on the probabilistic behavior of each task - or instances (jobs) of it - that have not been shown how to be fulfilled by PTA. This paper makes a first step towards covering this gap with emphasis on providing the right meaning of pWCET estimate as understood by both PTA and PTS. We show that the main issue related to ensuring that PTS assumptions on pWCET estimates are captured by PTA relates to the dependencies among tasks, and even jobs of a given task. Both change the scope of applicability of pWCET estimates provided by PTA and hence, their use by PTS.

This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under grant TIN2015-65316-P. Jaume Abella has been partially supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under Ramon y Cajal fellowship number RYC-2013-14717. Carles Hernández is jointly funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER funds through grant TIN2014-60404-JIN.

Peer Reviewed