<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T16:12:08Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2445/228774" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2445/228774</identifier><datestamp>2026-04-12T02:54:23Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1057</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478820</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478917</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Temporalism and eternalism reconsidered: perceptual experience, memory, and knowledge</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Nawar, Tamar</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Filosofia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Percepció del temps</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Atribució (Psicologia social)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Creença i dubte</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Veritat</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Memòria (Filosofia)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Proposició (Lògica)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Philosophy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Time perception</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Attribution (Social Psychology)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Belief and doubt</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Truth</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Memory (Philosophy)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Proposition (Logic)</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>Traditional debates between semantic temporalists and eternalists appeal to the efficacy of temporal operators and the intuitive (in)validity of instances of temporal reasoning.
In this paper, I argue that such debates are inconclusive at best and that under-explored arguments concerning perceptual experience, memory, and knowledge offer more productive means of advancing debates between temporalists and eternalists and rendering salient several significant potential costs and benefits of these views.</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2026-04-09T14:39:20Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2026-04-09T14:39:20Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2024-06-01</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2026-04-09T14:39:20Z</dc:date>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>0039-7857</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/2445/228774</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>934696</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04535-w</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>Synthese, 2024, vol. 203, num.6</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04535-w</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>cc by (c) Nawar, Tamar, 2024</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>20 p.</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Springer Verlag</dc:publisher>
   <dc:source>Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>