<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-05T12:42:33Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2445/226403" metadataPrefix="didl">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2445/226403</identifier><datestamp>2026-01-30T20:07:43Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1057</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478823</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478917</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
   <d:DIDLInfo>
      <dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2026-01-30T20:07:43Z</dcterms:created>
   </d:DIDLInfo>
   <d:Item id="hdl_2445_226403">
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:2445/226403</dii:Identifier>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
               <dc:title>On the relativistic impulse approximation for the calculation of Compton scattering cross sections and photon interaction coefficients used in kV dosimetry</dc:title>
               <dc:creator>Wang, X.J.</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Miguel, Beatriz</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Seuntjens, J.</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Fernández Varea, José María</dc:creator>
               <dc:subject>Fotons</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Dosimetria (Radiació)</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Transferència d'energia</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Grafit</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Photons</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Radiation dosimetry</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Energy transfer</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Graphite</dc:subject>
               <dc:description>&lt;p>We calculate differential and integrated cross sections for the Compton interaction as well as mass&lt;/p>&lt;p>attenuation (μC/ρ), mass energy-transfer (μC&lt;/p>&lt;p>tr/ρ), and mass energy-absorption (μen/ρ)&lt;/p>&lt;p>coefficients, within the relativistic impulse approximation (RIA) using Compton profiles (CPs)&lt;/p>&lt;p>obtained from unrestricted Hartree–Fock electron densities. We investigate the impact of using&lt;/p>&lt;p>molecular as opposed to atomic CPs on dosimetric photon interaction coefficients for air, water&lt;/p>&lt;p>and graphite, and compare our cross sections to the simpler Waller–Hartree (WH) and&lt;/p>&lt;p>Klein–Nishina (KN) formalisms. We find that differences in μC/ρ and μC&lt;/p>&lt;p>tr/ρ resulting from the&lt;/p>&lt;p>choice of CPs within the RIA are small relative to the differences between the RIA, WH, and KN&lt;/p>&lt;p>calculations. Surprisingly, although the WH binding corrections seem accurate when considering&lt;/p>&lt;p>μC/ρ, there are significant discrepancies between the WH and RIA results when we look at μC&lt;/p>&lt;p>tr/ρ.&lt;/p>&lt;p>The WH theory can differ substantially from the predictions of KN and the RIA in the tens of keV&lt;/p>&lt;p>range (e.g. 6%–10% at 20 keV), when Compton scattering becomes the dominant interaction&lt;/p>&lt;p>mechanism. For lower energies, the disagreement further grows to about one order of magnitude&lt;/p>&lt;p>at 1 keV. However, since the photoelectric effect transfers more energy than the Compton&lt;/p>&lt;p>interaction in the tens of keV range and below, the differences in the total μen/ρ values resulting&lt;/p>&lt;p>from the choice of Compton models (KN, WH, or RIA) are not larger than 0.4%, and the&lt;/p>&lt;p>differences between WH and the other two theories are no longer prominent.&lt;/p></dc:description>
               <dc:date>2026-01-30T20:07:43Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2026-01-30T20:07:43Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2026-01-29T13:14:29Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2026-01-29T13:14:29Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2020-01-01</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2026-01-29T13:14:29Z</dc:date>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
               <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2445/226403</dc:identifier>
               <dc:relation>Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab8108</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2020, vol. 65, p. 125010-1-125010-16</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab8108</dc:relation>
               <dc:rights>(c) ART AMB B, 2020</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
               <dc:publisher>ART AMB B</dc:publisher>
            </oai_dc:dc>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
   </d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>