<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T00:55:19Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2445/213301" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2445/213301</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-05T05:56:22Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1057</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478917</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478919</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Remarks on solidarity in bankruptcy problems when agents merge or split</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Calleja, Pere</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Llerena Garrés, Francesc</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Sudhölter, Peter</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Fallida</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Anàlisi vectorial</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Solidaritat</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Bancs</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Bankruptcy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Vector analysis</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Solidarity</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Banks</dc:subject>
   <dcterms:abstract>In this note, we investigate the relationship between non-manipulability via merging (splitting) and strong non-manipulability via merging (splitting). Our analysis reveals that while these two non-manipulability axioms are generally not equivalent, they do coincide when the principle of solidarity is satisfied. This principle is fulfilled by a wide range of bankruptcy rules, including parametric rules.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:issued>2024-06-17T06:58:48Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2023-09-01</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2024-06-17T06:58:53Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2026-08-31</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:relation>Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.004</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>Mathematical Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 125, p. 61-64</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.004</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier B.V., 2023</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Elsevier B.V.</dc:publisher>
   <dc:source>Articles publicats en revistes (Matemàtica Econòmica, Financera i Actuarial)</dc:source>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>