<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-19T16:00:00Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2445/176689" metadataPrefix="didl">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2445/176689</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-04T19:36:22Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1057</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478813</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478917</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
   <d:Item id="hdl_2445_176689">
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:2445/176689</dii:Identifier>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
               <dc:title>Authenticity assessment and fraud quantitation of coffee adulterated with chicory, barley and blours by untargeted HPLC-UV-FLD fingerprinting and chemometrics</dc:title>
               <dc:creator>Núñez, Nerea</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Saurina, Javier</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Núñez Burcio, Oscar</dc:creator>
               <dc:subject>Qualitat dels aliments</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Cafè (Beguda)</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Alteració d'aliments</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Quimiometria</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Food quality</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Coffee drink</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Food spoilage</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Chemometrics</dc:subject>
               <dc:description>Coffee, one of the most popular drinks around the world, is also one of the beverages most sus-ceptible of being adulterated. Untargeted high-performance liquid chromatography with ultra-violet and fluorescence detection (HPLC-UV-FLD) fingerprinting strategies in combination with chemometrics were employed for the authenticity assessment and fraud quantitation of adulter-ated coffees involving three different and common adulterants: chicory, barley and flours. The methodologies were applied after a solid-liquid extraction procedure with a methanol:water 50:50 (v/v) solution as extracting solvent. Chromatographic fingerprints were obtained using a Kinetex® C18 reversed-phase column under gradient elution conditions using 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and methanol as mobile phase components. The obtained coffee and adulter-ants extract HPLC-UV-FLD fingerprints were evaluated by partial least squares regres-sion-discriminants analysis (PLS-DA) resulting to be excellent chemical descriptors for sample discrimination. 100% classification rates for both PLS-DA calibration and prediction models were obtained. Besides, Arabica and Robusta coffee samples were adulterated with chicory, bar-ley and flours, and the obtained HPLC-UV-FLD fingerprints subjected to partial least squares (PLS) regression, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed methodologies to assess coffee authenticity and to quantify adulteration levels (down to 15%), showing both calibration and prediction errors below 1.3% and 2.4%, respectively.</dc:description>
               <dc:date>2021-04-26T09:25:13Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2021-04-26T09:25:13Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2021-04-12</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2021-04-26T09:25:13Z</dc:date>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
               <dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040840</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>Foods, 2021, vol. 10, num. 4, p. 840</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040840</dc:relation>
               <dc:rights>cc-by (c) Núñez, Nerea et al., 2021</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
               <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
               <dc:source>Articles publicats en revistes  (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)</dc:source>
            </oai_dc:dc>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
   </d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>