<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T11:47:07Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2445/174407" metadataPrefix="didl">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2445/174407</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-05T09:35:54Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1057</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478777</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478799</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478916</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478917</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
   <d:Item id="hdl_2445_174407">
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:2445/174407</dii:Identifier>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
               <dc:title>Inter-individual different responses to continuous and interval training in recreational middle-aged women runners</dc:title>
               <dc:creator>Bonet, Jèssica B.</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Magalhães, José</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Viscor Carrasco, Ginés</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Pagés, Teresa</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Ventura i Farré, Josep Lluís</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Torrella Guio, Joan Ramon</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Javierre Garcés, Casimiro F.</dc:creator>
               <dc:subject>Dones esportistes</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Corredors (Esports)</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Educació física</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Women athletes</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Runners (Sports)</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Physical education and training</dc:subject>
               <dc:description>A crucial subject in sports is identifying the inter-individual variation in response to training, which would allow creating individualised pre-training schedules, improving runner's performance. We aimed to analyse heterogeneity in individual responses to two half-marathon training programmes differing in running volume and intensity in middle-aged recreational women. Twenty women (40±7 years, 61±7kg, 167±6cm, VO2max=48±6 mL·kg-1·min-1) underwent either moderate-intensity continuous (MICT) or high-intensity interval (HIIT) 12-week training. They were evaluated before and after training with maximal incremental tests in the laboratory (VO2max) and in the field (time to exhaustion, TTE; short interval series and long run). All the women participated in the same half-marathon and their finishing times were compared with their previous times. Although the improvements in the mean finishing times were not significant, MICT elicited a greater reduction (3min 50s, P=0.298), with more women (70%) improving on their previous times, than HIIT (reduction of 2min 34s, P=0.197, 50% responders). Laboratory tests showed more differences in the HIIT group (P=0.008), while both groups presented homogeneous significant (P&lt;0.05) increases in TTE. Both in the short interval series and in the long run, HIIT induced better individual improvements, with a greater percentage of responders compared to MICT (100% versus 50% in the short series and 78% versus 38% in the long run). In conclusion, variability in interindividual responses was observed after both MICT and HIIT, with some participants showing improvements (responders) while others did not (non-responders) in different performance parameters, reinforcing the idea that individualised training prescription is needed to optimise performance.</dc:description>
               <dc:date>2021-02-26T11:45:39Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2021-02-26T11:45:39Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2020-10-22</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2021-02-26T11:45:39Z</dc:date>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
               <dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.579835</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>Frontiers in Physiology, 2020, vol. 11, num. e579835</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.579835</dc:relation>
               <dc:rights>cc-by (c) Bonet, Jèssica B. et al., 2020</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
               <dc:publisher>Frontiers Media</dc:publisher>
               <dc:source>Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia)</dc:source>
            </oai_dc:dc>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
   </d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>