2026-04-13T05:57:42Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/requestoai:recercat.cat:2445/1567782025-12-05T13:10:57Zcom_2072_1057col_2072_478798col_2072_478917
RECERCAT
author
Marcovitch, Harvey
author
Barbour, Virginia
author
Borrell i Thió, Carme
author
Bosch, Fèlix
author
Fernández Muñoz, Esteve
author
Macdonald, Helen
author
Marusic, Ana
author
Nylenna, Magne
2020-04-22T10:06:21Z2020-04-22T10:06:21Z2010-02-012020-04-22T10:06:21Z
A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behavior. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip of an iceberg and many cases go unreported.
cc-by-nd (c) Marcovitch, Harvey et al., 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Recerca
Indústria farmacèutica
Discussió
Research
Pharmaceutical industry
Discussion
Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion