2026-04-14T05:52:02Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/requestoai:recercat.cat:2445/1567782025-12-05T13:10:57Zcom_2072_1057col_2072_478798col_2072_478917
urn:hdl:2445/156778
Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009
Marcovitch, Harvey
Barbour, Virginia
Borrell i Thió, Carme
Bosch, Fèlix
Fernández Muñoz, Esteve
Macdonald, Helen
Marusic, Ana
Nylenna, Magne
Recerca
Indústria farmacèutica
Discussió
Research
Pharmaceutical industry
Discussion
A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behavior. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip of an iceberg and many cases go unreported.
2020-04-22T10:06:21Z
2020-04-22T10:06:21Z
2010-02-01
2020-04-22T10:06:21Z
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.7
Croatian Medical Journal, 2010, vol. 51, num. 1, p. 7-15
https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.7
cc-by-nd (c) Marcovitch, Harvey et al., 2010
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/es
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)