2026-04-13T04:04:30Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:2445/1470632025-12-06T01:59:27Zcom_2072_1057col_2072_478820col_2072_478917

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Marques, Teresa author 2019-12-20T16:25:02Z 2019-12-20T16:25:02Z 2017 2019-12-20T16:25:03Z Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements - how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste disputes could be explained as metalinguistic negotiations - conversations where interlocutors negotiate how best to use a word relative to a context. I argue here that metalinguistic negotiations are neither necessary nor sufficient for genuine evaluative and normative disputes to occur. A comprehensive account of value talk requires stronger metanormative commitments than metalinguistic negotiations afford. Filosofia del llenguatge Metallenguatge Norma (Filosofia) Discussió Philosophy of language Metalanguage Norm (Philosophy) Discussion What metalinguistic negotiations can't do