<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T20:32:06Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2445/114874" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2445/114874</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-05T16:10:19Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1057</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478904</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_478917</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Non-Gaussianity from large-scale structure surveys</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Verde, Licia</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Relativitat general (Física)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Cosmologia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>General relativity (Physics)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Cosmology</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>With the advent of galaxy surveys which provide large samples of galaxies or galaxy clusters over a volume comparable to the horizon size (SDSS-III, HETDEX, Euclid, JDEM, LSST, Pan-STARRS, CIP, etc.) or mass-selected large cluster samples over a large fraction of the extra-galactic sky (Planck, SPT, ACT, CMBPol, B-Pol), it is timely to investigate what constraints these surveys can impose on primordial non-Gaussianity. I illustrate here three different approaches: higher-order correlations of the three dimensional galaxy distribution, abundance of rare objects (extrema of the density distribution), and the large-scale clustering of halos (peaks of the density distribution). Each of these avenues has its own advantages, but, more importantly, these approaches are highly complementary under many respects.</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2017-09-01T08:37:05Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2017-09-01T08:37:05Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2017-09-01T08:37:05Z</dc:date>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>1687-7969</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/2445/114874</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>603918</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/768675</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>Advances In Astronomy, 2010, vol. 2010, num. 768675</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/768675</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/240117/EU//PHYS.LSS</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>cc-by (c) Verde, Licia, 2010</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>16 p.</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:source>Articles publicats en revistes (Institut de Ciències del Cosmos (ICCUB))</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>