<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-13T05:47:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:2117/16972" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:2117/16972</identifier><datestamp>2026-02-07T11:30:44Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_1033</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_452950</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>A note on upper bound formulations in limit analysis</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Muñoz Romero, José</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Huerta, Antonio</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Bonet Carbonell, Javier</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Peraire Guitart, Jaume</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada III</dc:contributor>
   <dc:contributor>Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. LACÀN - Mètodes Numèrics en Ciències Aplicades i Enginyeria</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi numèrica::Mètodes numèrics</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Numerical analysis--Simulation methods</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Elements finits, Mètode dels -- Anàlisi numèrica</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>65C Simulació numèrica</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>In this paper we study some recent formulations for the computation of upper bounds in limit analysis.&#xd;
We show that a previous formulation presented by the authors does not guarantee the strictness of the&#xd;
upper bound, nor does it provide a velocity field that satisfies the normality rule everywhere. We show&#xd;
that these deficiencies are related to the quadrature employed for the evaluation of the dissipation power.&#xd;
We derive a formulation that furnishes a strict upper bound of the load factor, which in fact coincides with&#xd;
a formulation reported in the literature. From the analysis of these formulations we propose a post-process&#xd;
which consists in computing exactly the dissipation power for the optimum upper bound velocity field.&#xd;
This post-process may further reduce the strict upper bound of the load factor in particular situations.&#xd;
Finally, we also determine the quadratures that must be used in the elemental and edge gap contributions&#xd;
so that they are always positive and their addition equals the global bound gap.</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Peer Reviewed</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Postprint (published version)</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2012-08-24</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Article</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>Muñoz, J. [et al.]. A note on upper bound formulations in limit analysis. "International journal for numerical methods in engineering", 24 Agost 2012, vol. 91, núm. 8, p. 896-908.</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>0029-5981</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/2117/16972</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>10.1002/nme.4303</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>Restricted access - publisher's policy</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Spain</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>13 p.</dc:format>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>John Wiley &amp; Sons</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>