2026-04-14T02:25:14Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:2072/4832442025-05-08T16:44:29Zcom_2072_98col_2072_378192

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Fontanellas Fes, Albert author Hinarejos Gómez, Pedro author Pérez-Prieto, Daniel author Martínez-Lozano, Jan author Sánchez-Soler, Juan author Torres-Claramunt, Raúl author Perelli, Simone author Monllau García, Joan Carles author 2025 Introduction: One of the main concerns around the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is the potential reduction in the mechanical properties of the cement when antibiotics are admixed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference between plain cement and ALBC in terms of radiological intrusion into the bone in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Methods: Prospective randomized study of 80 consecutive patients who underwent TKA. Depending on the cement used, patients were divided into two groups by a computer-generated randomization programme: the cement without antibiotic (Group 1) or the ALBC (Group 2). Cement intrusion was measured in postoperative radiographs in eight different regions in the tibial component and six regions in the femoral component. Results: The average cement intrusion was similar in both groups (p = nonsignificance [n.s.]). Group 1 (plain cement) had an average cement intrusion in the femur of 1.4 mm (±0.4) and 2.4 mm (±0.4) in the tibia. In Group 2 (ALBC), the average cement intrusion in the femur came to 1.6 (±0.5) and 2.4 mm (±0.5) in the tibia. In 80% of the patients, the cement intrusion in the tibia averaged a minimum of 2 mm, being similar in both groups (p = n.s.). Conclusion: There are no differences in bone intrusion when comparing plain cement to ALBC. Therefore, the use of ALBC in primary TKA may be indicated, achieving optimal bone penetration. Level of Evidence: Level I. Comparable bone penetration between antibiotic-loaded and plain bone cement in total knee arthroplasty