2026-04-17T02:55:50Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:2072/4038192024-11-24T23:03:25Zcom_2072_98col_2072_378192

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Martí Olivé, Joel author Villasante, Tomás R. author 2009 One of the current debates in action research concerns the quality of these practices.Up to now, many contributions have focused on defining specific criteria based on action research epistemology. This article sustains (1) that prior to dealing with these questions, it is necessary to define for what purpose and for whom we are making the evaluation; (2) that this leads us to make a distinction between different evaluation models; and (3) that the quality strategies and criteria will be different for each model.In particular, the article confronts an academic evaluation model as a form of external control over the quality of action research and an internal, participatory evaluation model as a quality strategy aimed at establishing feedback for the process. Final considerations are given about the implications of both models for academia Investigació en acció Avaluació Metodologia Action research Quality Validity Evaluation Quality in action research : reflections for second-order inquiry