2026-04-05T12:52:03Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/51342025-11-08T13:32:10Zcom_2072_67741col_2072_484352

Clinical Trends in the Prevention of Peri-Implantitis: Spanish Society of Periodontology (SEPA) Foundation Survey Using the Delphi Method Monje, Alberto Molina, Ana Argibay, Olalla de Tapia Pastor, Beatriz Derks, Jan Figuero, Elena Guerrero , Adrián Luengo, Fernando Montero, Eduardo Montero, Eduardo Sanz Martín, Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez, Ignacio Valles, Cristina Nart, Jose Complication endosseous implant Dental implant Mucositis Peri-implant disease Peri-implantitis Implante endoóseo con complicaciones Implante dental Mucositis Enfermedad periimplantaria Periimplantitis Implant endoossi amb complicacions Implant dental Mucositis Malaltia periimplantaria Periimplantitis This work was supported by Ticare Implants (Mozo- Grau SA, Valladolid, Spain) Objective: To assess clinical trends to prevent peri-implantitis in applying a two-step survey based on the Delphi method.Material and Methods: A panel of participants aged < 45 years old selected by the Spanish Society of Periodontology (SEPA)was asked to answer a survey with 75 statements prepared by a steering committee. Items were divided into 5 major areas: eti-opathogenesis and epidemiology, surgical, implant, and prosthetic-related factors on the onset/progression of peri-implantitis,and self- and professional-administered oral hygiene. Degree of agreement or disagreement among participants was reported.Results: In total, 44 participants responded favorably to participate in the survey. From the 75 statements formulated, 35 wereagreed on in a first round (46.7%). From the 40 statements that did not reach consensus, 16 were agreed on in a second round(40.0%). Overall, 51 out of 75 statements (68.0%) achieved consensus in a second round. From these, 36 (48.0%) were in agree-ment, while 15 (20.0%) were in disagreement. The sections that explored surgical-related factors and prosthesis-related factorsof peri-implantitis yielded the highest level of conflict (9/18 and 8/14 statements demonstrated indeterminate agreement, re-spectively). In the sections on the etiopathogenesis and epidemiology of peri-implantitis and implant-related factors, most itemsreached consensus (14/17 and 10/13 items, respectively). The section on self- and professional-administered oral hygiene ob-tained the highest level of consensus, with only 1/13 items showing dissent among the participants.Conclusion: The results of this study on the clinical trends in the prevention of peri-implantitis showed consensus agreementfor ∼70% of the statements evaluated. 2025-11-08T13:32:10Z 2025-11-08T13:32:10Z 2025-05-29 2025-08-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article Monje, Alberto; Molina, Ana; Argibay, Olalla[et al.]. Clinical Trends in the Prevention of Peri-Implantitis:Spanish Society of Periodontology (SEPA) FoundationSurvey Using the Delphi Method. Clinical Oral Implantants Research, 2025, páginas 1-15. Disponible en <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40874380/>. Fecha de acceso: 7 nov. 2025. DOI:10.1111/clr.70030 0905-7161 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/5134 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.70030 eng Clinical Oral Implants Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess © 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Wiley