2026-04-18T00:23:09Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/requestoai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/51342025-11-08T13:32:10Zcom_2072_67741col_2072_484352
2025-11-08T13:32:10Z
urn:hdl:20.500.12328/5134
Clinical Trends in the Prevention of Peri-Implantitis: Spanish Society of Periodontology (SEPA) Foundation Survey Using the Delphi Method
Monje, Alberto
Molina, Ana
Argibay, Olalla
de Tapia Pastor, Beatriz
Derks, Jan
Figuero, Elena
Guerrero , Adrián
Luengo, Fernando
Montero, Eduardo
Montero, Eduardo
Sanz Martín, Ignacio
Sanz-Sánchez, Ignacio
Valles, Cristina
Nart, Jose
Complication endosseous implant
Dental implant
Mucositis
Peri-implant disease
Peri-implantitis
Implante endoóseo con complicaciones
Implante dental
Mucositis
Enfermedad periimplantaria
Periimplantitis
Implant endoossi amb complicacions
Implant dental
Mucositis
Malaltia periimplantaria
Periimplantitis
This work was supported by Ticare Implants (Mozo- Grau SA, Valladolid, Spain)
Objective: To assess clinical trends to prevent peri-implantitis in applying a two-step survey based on the Delphi method.Material and Methods: A panel of participants aged < 45 years old selected by the Spanish Society of Periodontology (SEPA)was asked to answer a survey with 75 statements prepared by a steering committee. Items were divided into 5 major areas: eti-opathogenesis and epidemiology, surgical, implant, and prosthetic-related factors on the onset/progression of peri-implantitis,and self- and professional-administered oral hygiene. Degree of agreement or disagreement among participants was reported.Results: In total, 44 participants responded favorably to participate in the survey. From the 75 statements formulated, 35 wereagreed on in a first round (46.7%). From the 40 statements that did not reach consensus, 16 were agreed on in a second round(40.0%). Overall, 51 out of 75 statements (68.0%) achieved consensus in a second round. From these, 36 (48.0%) were in agree-ment, while 15 (20.0%) were in disagreement. The sections that explored surgical-related factors and prosthesis-related factorsof peri-implantitis yielded the highest level of conflict (9/18 and 8/14 statements demonstrated indeterminate agreement, re-spectively). In the sections on the etiopathogenesis and epidemiology of peri-implantitis and implant-related factors, most itemsreached consensus (14/17 and 10/13 items, respectively). The section on self- and professional-administered oral hygiene ob-tained the highest level of consensus, with only 1/13 items showing dissent among the participants.Conclusion: The results of this study on the clinical trends in the prevention of peri-implantitis showed consensus agreementfor ∼70% of the statements evaluated.
2025-11-08T13:32:10Z
2025-11-08T13:32:10Z
2025-05-29
2025-08-28
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Monje, Alberto; Molina, Ana; Argibay, Olalla[et al.]. Clinical Trends in the Prevention of Peri-Implantitis:Spanish Society of Periodontology (SEPA) FoundationSurvey Using the Delphi Method. Clinical Oral Implantants Research, 2025, páginas 1-15. Disponible en <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40874380/>. Fecha de acceso: 7 nov. 2025. DOI:10.1111/clr.70030
0905-7161
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/5134
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.70030
eng
Clinical Oral Implants Research
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Wiley