2026-04-17T03:48:53Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request
oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/45432025-05-16T12:50:28Zcom_2072_67741col_2072_484352
RECERCAT author Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi author Zilleruelo-Pozo, María José author Lucas-Taulé, Ernest author Muñoz Peñalver, Jesús author Paternostro-Betancourt, Daniel author Hernandez Alfaro, Federico 2025-05-16T12:50:28Z 2025-05-16T12:50:28Z 2022 Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi; Zilleruelo-Pozo, María José; Lucas-Taulé, Ernest [et al.]. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26, p. 2783-2791. Disponible en: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3>. Fecha de acceso: 16 ene. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3 1436-3771 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4543 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3 Objective: A cohort prospective study was conducted to assess the three-dimensional positioning accuracy of the implant between pre-surgical and the final implant position using a static fully guided approach in the posterior area of the jaws. Materials and methods: A total of 60 implants (30 patients) were digitally analyzed after superimposing the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files obtained from the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) pre- and post-implant placement. The software calculations included deviations at the implant shoulder and at the implant apex, global deviation (3D offset), and angle deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with α = 0.05. Results: Considering the total number of implants, mesiodistal, buccolingual, and apicocoronal mean deviations at the shoulder and implant apex were equal or below 0.21 ± 0.69 mm, and only the buccolingual mean deviation at the apex reached up to 0.67 ± 1.06 mm. The mesiodistal and apicocoronal deviations were not statistically significant at both the shoulder and apex levels of the implant. The mean total angular deviation was 5.62° ± 4.09. The main limitation of this surgical approach was the requirement for a wide mouth opening. Conclusions: Static fully guided surgery for dental implant placement exhibits minimum deviations respect to presurgical planning. The main limitation in the posterior areas is the requirement for a wide mouth opening. Clinical relevance: Even with minimum deviations clinically acceptable, precautions and safety margins must be respected when using static full-guided surgery to place dental implants. eng © 2022 Springer Nature Precisió Cirurgia assistida per ordinador Assistida per ordinador Imatge tridimensional Implants dentals Precisión Cirugía asistida por computadora Cirugía asistida por computadora Imágenes tridimensionales Implantes dentales Accuracy Computer-aided surgery Computer-assisted Three-dimensional imaging Dental implants Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study info:eu-repo/semantics/article