2026-04-14T03:15:56Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/requestoai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/39272025-05-16T13:02:25Zcom_2072_67741col_2072_484352
RECERCAT
author
León, Javier
author
Carrascosa, Alejandro
author
Rodríguez, Xavier
author
Ruiz Magaz, Vanessa
author
Pascual, Andrés
author
Nart, José
2025-05-16T13:02:25Z
2025-05-16T13:02:25Z
2014
León, Javier; Carrascosa, Alejandro; Rodríguez, Xavier [et al.]. Finite element analysis relative to the crestal position of a 3.0-mm-diameter implant. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2014, 34, p. 381-387. Disponible en: <https://www.quintpub.com/journals/prd/abstract.php?iss2_id=1230&article_id=14408&article=12&title=Finite%20Element%20Analysis%20Relative%20to%20the%20Crestal%20Position%20of%20a%203.0-mm-Diameter%20Implant#.U_3w9kuRNZg>. Fecha de acceso: 22 ene. 2024. DOI: 10.11607/prd.1960
0198-7569
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3927
https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.1960
It has been shown that implant designs and different vertical positions have an influence on crestal bone. The purpose of this study was to use finite element (FE) analysis to biomechanically investigate the influence of the stress/strain distribution in a maxillary anterior 3.0-mm-diameter implant in relation to its apicocoronal level after oblique loading. Two different FE models, depending on implant position relative to bone crest, were applied. It can be concluded that placing the implant-abutment interface supracrestally provides decreased levels of stress and strain in the surrounding bone. However, placing the implant 0.5 mm supracrestally is also acceptable according to this analysis.
eng
Implants dentals
Implantes dentales
Dental implants
Finite element analysis relative to the crestal position of a 3.0-mm-diameter implant
info:eu-repo/semantics/article