2026-04-17T20:46:38Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request
oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12327/27082025-10-22T11:00:50Zcom_2072_4428com_2072_4427col_2072_487898
RECERCAT author Lobato-Bailón, Lourdes author López-Baucells, Adrià author Guixé, David author Flaquer, Carles author Camprodon, Jordi author Florensa-Rius, Xavier author Mas, Maria author Torrent, Laura author Ordeix, Laura author Tallo-Parra, Oriol author Ribas, Maria P. author Marco, Ignasi author Carvajal, Annaïs author López-Bejar, Manel author Napp, Sebastian author Pailler-García, Lola author Espunyes, Johan author Cabezón, Oscar other Producció Animal group Sanitat Animal 2025-10-22T11:00:49Z 2025-10-22T11:00:49Z 2023-09-10 Lobato-Bailón, Lourdes, Adrià López‐Baucells, David Guixé, Carles Flaquer, Jordi Camprodón, Xavier Florensa-Rius, M. Mas, et al. 2023. “Reappraising the Use of Forearm Rings for Bat Species.” Biological Conservation 286: 110268. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110268. 0006-3207 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/2708 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110268 Long-term mark-recapture studies are essential for bat conservation. Over the last decades, millions of bats across Europe and America have been marked with forearm rings for this purpose. Although it is considered a costeffective method compared to Passive Integrated Transponders (PIT) tags, direct injuries from using forearm rings have been reported since their very first use. Yet, their impact on bats’ welfare has not been systematically evaluated and remains a highly controversial issue among the scientific community and policymakers. Here we assess the impact of forearm rings and PIT tags on the health of different bat species. We reviewed 12 years of the existing recapture data of free-ranging bats from NE Spain and evaluated the impact of both marking tools in a captive colony of Carollia perspicillata, by assessing the development of skin lesions and levels of cortisol metabolites in guano (CG) after marking. We report that 55.1 % (435/790) of the recaptured free-ranging bats with forearm rings presented skin lesions. All banded C. perspicillata (n = 22, 100 %) developed skin lesions, whereas none of the PIT-tagged (n = 21) presented lesions. Levels of CG were significantly higher after marking with forearm rings only for one group. Banded C. perspicillata exhibited discomfort-associated behaviours due to forearm rings. Under the “precautionary principle”, we recommend the ban of forearm rings for all bat species until species-specific studies under controlled conditions are performed and approved by a legally constituted ethics committee. Consideration of other long-term marking tools is mandatory to align with global bat conservation strategies. eng Attribution 4.0 International Reappraising the use of forearm rings for bat species info:eu-repo/semantics/article