<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T23:15:52Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:11351/11962" metadataPrefix="didl">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:11351/11962</identifier><datestamp>2025-10-24T10:28:43Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_378070</setSpec><setSpec>com_2072_378040</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_378092</setSpec></header><metadata><d:DIDL xmlns:d="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
   <d:DIDLInfo>
      <dcterms:created xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2025-10-24T10:28:43Z</dcterms:created>
   </d:DIDLInfo>
   <d:Item id="hdl_11351_11962">
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <dii:Identifier xmlns:dii="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS" xsi:schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:11351/11962</dii:Identifier>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
      <d:Descriptor>
         <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
            <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
               <dc:title>Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for nonmetastatic pT4 colon cancer: A European multicentre propensity score-matched analysis</dc:title>
               <dc:creator>piccoli, micaela</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Alfieri, Sergio</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>AISONI, FILIPPO</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>de'Angelis, Nicola</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Schena, Carlo Alberto</dc:creator>
               <dc:creator>Espin-Basany, Eloy</dc:creator>
               <dc:subject>Robòtica en medicina</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Còlon - Càncer - Cirurgia</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Cirurgia laparoscòpica</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Extirpació (Cirurgia)</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Digestive System Neoplasms::Gastrointestinal Neoplasms::Intestinal Neoplasms::Colorectal Neoplasms::Colonic Neoplasms</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/surgery</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Surgical Procedures, Operative::Digestive System Surgical Procedures::Colectomy</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Diagnosis::Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures::Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical::Endoscopy::Laparoscopy</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Therapeutics::Therapy, Computer-Assisted::Surgery, Computer-Assisted::Robotic Surgical Procedures</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias del sistema digestivo::neoplasias gastrointestinales::neoplasias intestinales::neoplasias colorrectales::neoplasias del colon</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/cirugía</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::intervenciones quirúrgicas::procedimientos quirúrgicos del sistema digestivo::colectomía</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::diagnóstico::técnicas y procedimientos diagnósticos::técnicas diagnósticas quirúrgicas::endoscopia::laparoscopia</dc:subject>
               <dc:subject>TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::terapéutica::tratamiento asistido por ordenador::cirugía asistida por ordenador::procedimientos quirúrgicos robotizados</dc:subject>
               <dc:description>Minimally invasive surgery; Right colon cancer; Robotic surgery</dc:description>
               <dc:description>Cirurgia mínimament invasiva; Càncer de còlon dret; Cirurgia robòtica</dc:description>
               <dc:description>Cirugía mínimamente invasiva; Cáncer de colon derecho; Cirugía robótica</dc:description>
               <dc:description>Aim&#xd;
Minimally invasive surgery has been increasingly adopted for locally advanced colon cancer. However, evidence comparing robotic (RRC) versus laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) for nonmetastatic pT4 cancers is lacking.&#xd;
Methods&#xd;
This was a multicentre propensity score-matched (PSM) study of a cohort of consecutive patients with pT4 right colon cancer treated with RRC or LRC. The two surgical approaches were compared in terms of R0, number of lymph nodes harvested, intra- and postoperative complication rates, overall (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS).&#xd;
Results&#xd;
Among a total of 200 patients, 39 RRC were compared with 78 PS-matched LRC patients. The R0 rate was similar between RRC and LRC (92.3% vs. 96.2%, respectively; p = 0.399), as was the odds of retrieving 12 or more lymph nodes (97.4% vs. 96.2%; p = 1). No significant difference was noted for the mean operating time (192.9 min vs. 198.3 min; p = 0.750). However, RRC was associated with fewer conversions to laparotomy (5.1% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.032), less blood loss (36.9 vs. 95.2 mL; p &lt; 0.0001), fewer postoperative complications (17.9% vs. 41%; p = 0.013), a shorter time to flatus (2 vs. 2.8 days; p = 0.009), and a shorter hospital stay (6.4 vs. 9.5 days; p &lt; 0.0001) compared with LRC. These results were confirmed even when converted procedures were excluded from the analysis. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS (p = 0.757) and DFS (p = 0.321) did not significantly differ between RRC and LRC.&#xd;
Conclusion&#xd;
Adequate oncological outcomes are observed for RRC and LRC performed for pT4 right colon cancer. However, RRC is associated with lower conversion rates and improved short-term postoperative outcomes.</dc:description>
               <dc:date>2025-10-24T10:28:43Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2025-10-24T10:28:43Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2024-09-25T09:53:24Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2024-09-25T09:53:24Z</dc:date>
               <dc:date>2024-08</dc:date>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
               <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
               <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11351/11962</dc:identifier>
               <dc:relation>Colorectal Disease;26(8)</dc:relation>
               <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17089</dc:relation>
               <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
               <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
               <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
               <dc:source>Scientia</dc:source>
            </oai_dc:dc>
         </d:Statement>
      </d:Descriptor>
   </d:Item>
</d:DIDL></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>