<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T22:14:37Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:11351/10408" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:11351/10408</identifier><datestamp>2025-10-24T08:24:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_378070</setSpec><setSpec>com_2072_378040</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_378092</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Picola Brau, Natalia</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Paesano, Nahuel</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Ruiz Plazas, Xavier</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Muñoz-Rivero, Marta V.</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Muñoz-Rodriguez, Jesus</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Celma, Ana</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Morote Robles, Juan</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Pròstata - Càncer - Diagnòstic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Biòpsia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Diagnosis::Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures::Clinical Laboratory Techniques::Cytological Techniques::Cytodiagnosis::Biopsy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Urogenital Neoplasms::Genital Neoplasms, Male::Prostatic Neoplasms</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/diagnosis</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::diagnóstico::técnicas y procedimientos diagnósticos::técnicas de laboratorio clínico::técnicas citológicas::citodiagnóstico::biopsia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias urogenitales::neoplasias de los genitales masculinos::neoplasias de la próstata</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/diagnóstico</dc:subject>
   <dcterms:abstract>Prostate biopsy concordance; Systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:abstract>Concordancia de biopsia de próstata; Biopsia sistemática; Biopsia dirigida</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:abstract>Concordança de biòpsia de pròstata; Biòpsia sistemàtica; Biòpsia dirigida</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:abstract>The primary objective of this study was to analyse the current accuracy of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies in detecting csPCa. A secondary objective was to determine whether there are factors predicting the finding of csPCa in targeted biopsies and, if so, to explore the utility of a predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies. We analysed 2122 men with suspected PCa, serum PSA > 3 ng/mL, and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies between 2021 and 2022. CsPCa (grade group 2 or higher) was detected in 1026 men (48.4%). Discrepancies in csPCa detection in targeted and systematic biopsies were observed in 49.6%, with 13.9% of csPCa cases being detected only in systematic biopsies and 35.7% only in targeted biopsies. A predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies was developed from the independent predictors age (years), prostate volume (mL), PI-RADS score (3 to 5), mpMRI Tesla (1.5 vs. 3.0), TRUS-MRI fusion image technique (cognitive vs. software), and prostate biopsy route (transrectal vs. transperineal). The csPCa discrimination ability of targeted biopsies showed an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI 0.721–0.762). The avoidance rate of systematic prostate biopsies went from 0.5% without missing csPCa to 18.3% missing 4.6% of csPCa cases. We conclude that the csPCa diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies is higher than that of systematic biopsies. However, a significant rate of csPCa remains detected only in systematic biopsies. A predictive model for the partial omission of systematic biopsies was developed.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:abstract>This research was funded by the Instituto de Salut Carlos III (SP) and the European Union, grant number PI20/01666.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2025-10-24T08:24:45Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2025-10-24T08:24:45Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2025-10-24T08:24:45Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2023-10-05T07:47:08Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2023-10-05T07:47:08Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2023-09-13</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11351/10408</dc:identifier>
   <dc:relation>Cancers;15(18)</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184543</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PEICTI2021-2023%2FPI20%2F01666</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
   <dc:source>Scientia</dc:source>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>