<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-14T03:10:46Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10459.1/57984" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/57984</identifier><datestamp>2024-12-05T21:28:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_3622</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_479130</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Two formalisms of extended possibilistic logic programming with context-dependent fuzzy unification: A comparative description</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Alsinet, Teresa</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Godó, Lluís</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Sandri, Sandra</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>Possibilistic logic is a logic of uncertainty where a certainty degree between 0 and 1, interpreted as a lower bound of a necessity measure, is attached to each classical formula. In this paper we present a comparative description of two models extending first order possibilistic logic so as to allow for fuzzy unification. The first formalism, called PLFC, is a general extension that allows clauses with fuzzy constants and fuzzily restricted quantifiers. The second formalism is an implication-based extension defined on top of Gödel infinitely-valued logic, capable of dealing with fuzzy constants. In this paper we compare these approaches, mainly their Horn-clause fragments, discussing their basic differences, specially in what regards their unification and automated deduction mechanisms.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2024-12-05T21:28:45Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2024-12-05T21:28:45Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2024-12-05T21:28:45Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2016-10-19T10:55:02Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2016-10-19T10:55:02Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57984</dc:identifier>
   <dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80511-5</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2002, vol. 66, núm. 5, p. 1-21</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2002</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>