<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-18T04:32:40Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10459.1/57984" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/57984</identifier><datestamp>2024-12-05T21:28:45Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_3622</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_479130</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Two formalisms of extended possibilistic logic programming with context-dependent fuzzy unification: A comparative description</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Alsinet, Teresa</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Godó, Lluís</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Sandri, Sandra</dc:creator>
   <dc:description>Possibilistic logic is a logic of uncertainty where a certainty degree between 0 and 1, interpreted as a lower bound of a necessity measure, is attached to each classical formula. In this paper we present a comparative description of two models extending first order possibilistic logic so as to allow for fuzzy unification. The first formalism, called PLFC, is a general extension that allows clauses with fuzzy constants and fuzzily restricted quantifiers. The second formalism is an implication-based extension defined on top of Gödel infinitely-valued logic, capable of dealing with fuzzy constants. In this paper we compare these approaches, mainly their Horn-clause fragments, discussing their basic differences, specially in what regards their unification and automated deduction mechanisms.</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2016-10-19T10:55:02Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2016-10-19T10:55:02Z</dc:date>
   <dc:date>2002</dc:date>
   <dc:type>article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>publishedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80511-5</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>1571-0661</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57984</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/57984</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80511-5</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2002, vol. 66, núm. 5, p. 1-21</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2002</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>