2026-04-14T03:55:45Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/4640012025-09-15T18:11:50Zcom_2072_3622col_2072_479130

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Torres-Sánchez, Jorge author Escolà i Agustí, Alexandre author de Castro, Ana I. author López-Granados, Francisca author Rosell Polo, Joan Ramon author Sebé Feixas, Francesc author Jiménez-Brenes, Francisco M. author Sanz Cortiella, Ricardo author Gregorio López, Eduard author Peña, José M. author 2023-07-26 The measurement of geometric canopy parameters in woody crops is an important task in Precision Agriculture because of their correlation with crop condition and productivity. In recent years, several technological approaches have been developed as an alternative to manual measurements, which are time- and labour-consuming. Two of the most commonly used 3D canopy characterization technologies are mobile terrestrial laser scanning (MTLS) based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors, and digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) using imagery from uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). Although both are state-of-the-art and have been fully tested and validated, a complete comparison between their geometric canopy parameter estimations in different woody crops and training systems has not been carried out. For this reason, a set of geometric parameters (canopy height, projected area, and volume) of a vineyard, an intensive peach orchard, and an intensive pear orchard were measured using UAV-DAP and MTLS-LiDAR. A comparison between both kinds of measurements was performed, accounting for the length of the sections in which the crop hedgerows were divided to extract the geometric parameters. Measurements from the UAV and the MTLS were highly correlated (R2 from 0.82 to 0.94) when considering the data from the three crops together, and the correlations were higher when analysing longer row sections. The canopy geometric parameters estimated using the MTLS-LiDAR always had higher values than those from the UAV-DAP. The results presented in this work provide useful data for a more informed selection of technological approaches for 3D crop characterization in Precision Fruticulture and high-throughput phenotyping. This research was funded by the projects DECIMAL (PID2020-113229RB-C41), PRODIGIA (PID2020-113229RB-C44), AGVANCE (AGL2013-48297-C2-2-R), and PAgPROTECT (PID2021-126648OB-I00), from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). The authors also wish to thank Codorníu SA, celler Raimat and IRTA for having allowed the use of their vineyards, pear and peach orchards to conduct the trials described in this work. Precision agriculture Digitalization Vineyard Pear Peach Mobile terrestrial laser scanner vs. UAV photogrammetry to estimate woody crop canopy parameters - Part 2: Comparison for different crops and training systems