<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-13T16:56:07Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10256/19422" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10256/19422</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-06T08:07:58Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_452966</setSpec><setSpec>com_2072_2054</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_452969</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Sobre la ratificación de dictámenes periciales en México</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Fuentes Reyes, Rubén Darío</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Imparcialitat</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Fairness</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Prova (Dret)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Evidence (Law)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Prova pericial -- Mèxic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Evidence, Expert -- México</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Procediment judicial -- Mèxic</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Judicial process -- Mexico</dc:subject>
   <dcterms:abstract>Con este trabajo me propongo demostrar que la ratificación de dictámenes periciales es una práctica que ya no debe existir, al tratarse de una reminiscencia de la declaración jurada, que no contribuye a la fiabilidad de la prueba pericial. Se toma la experiencia mexicana como ejemplo. La propuesta es centrarse más en la imparcialidad de los expertos y la contradicción en el desahogo de este tipo de prueba</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:abstract>With this paper my goal is to demonstrate that expert testimony affirmation it´s a practice that should not exist anymore, because it is a reminiscence of the sworn oath or affidavit, which does not contribute to the reliability of expert testimony. I show México´s experience as an example. My proposition is to focus on expert´s impartiality and contradiction in the production of this kind of evidence</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2024-06-06T08:07:58Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2024-06-06T08:07:58Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2024-06-06T08:07:58Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2018-03</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19422</dc:identifier>
   <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:coverage>east=-102.552784; north=23.634501; name=Mèxic</dc:coverage>
   <dc:source>Máster en Razonamiento Probatorio</dc:source>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>