<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-17T10:49:03Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10256/19036" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10256/19036</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-06T08:07:40Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_452966</setSpec><setSpec>com_2072_2054</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_452969</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>El juramento y su valor en el proceso judicial</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Hernández Lehmann, Victoria Julieta</dc:creator>
   <dc:contributor>Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica</dc:contributor>
   <dc:contributor>Università di Genova</dc:contributor>
   <dc:contributor>Dei Vecchi, Diego</dc:contributor>
   <dc:subject>Jutges -- Ètica Professional -- Costa Rica</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Judges -- Professional ethics -- Costa Rica</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Prova (Dret)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Evidence (Law)</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Procediment judicial -- Costa Rica</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Judicial process -- Costa Rica</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Ètica legal</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Legal ethics</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>The initiative of the judge to incorporate evidence in the process is a subject of wide discussion. In Costa Rica, the Civil Procedure Reform makes important changes that influence this initiative. The purpose of this article is to explain how these changes affect this disposition, what are the criticisms that are commonly made and if they have a base that allows the conclusion of the inadmissibility of the probatory initiative of the judge</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Los poderes probatorios del juez y en específico el poder de incorporar prueba al proceso es un tema de amplia discusión. En Costa Rica la Reforma Procesal Civil realizó cambios importantes que afectan este poder. Este artículo expone como inciden esos cambios en la iniciativa probatoria del juez, cuáles son las críticas que comúnmente se realizan y si tienen un fundamento que permita concluir la improcedencia de este poder del juez</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2019-05</dc:date>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19036</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19036</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>spa</dc:language>
   <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:coverage>east=-83.753428; north=9.748916999999999; name=Costa Rica</dc:coverage>
   <dc:source>Máster en Razonamiento Probatorio</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>