<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-18T01:46:07Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10256/16999" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10256/16999</identifier><datestamp>2024-06-14T09:49:12Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_452955</setSpec><setSpec>com_2072_2054</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_453065</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   <dc:title>An approach to Wittgenstein’s antirealism = Una aproximación al antirrealismo de wittgenstein</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Defez, Antoni</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Filosofia moderna -- S. XX</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Llenguatge i llengües -- Filosofia</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Realisme</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Subjectivitat</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Philosophy, Modern -- 20th century</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Language and languages -- Philosophy</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Realism</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Subjectivity</dc:subject>
   <dc:description>This article intends to analyze, in general, the romantic roots of Wittgenstein thought and, specifically, what could have been the position of Wittgenstein, especially the second Wittgenstein, on the philosophical problem of the language-reality relationship. No doubt it is a bold exercise, since Wittgenstein did not openly deal with this question, and would have considered it nonsense. However, its elucidation- the idea that Wittgenstein was committed to antirealism- seems to make his conception of language more understandable, and in particular how private languages would not be possible</dc:description>
   <dc:description>Este artículo pretende analizar la probable posición de Wittgenstein –sobre todo el segundo Wittgenstein– respecto del problema filosófico de la relación lenguaje-realidad. Sin duda, se trata de ejercicio atrevido, ya que Wittgenstein no se ocupó de esta cuestión abiertamente y la habría considerado un sinsentido. Sin embargo, su dilucidación –la idea que Wittgenstein estaba comprometido con el antirrealismo– parece hacer más comprensible su concepción del lenguaje, y en particular cómo no serían posibles los lenguajes privados</dc:description>
   <dc:date>2017-08-09</dc:date>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:type>peer-reviewed</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10256/16999</dc:identifier>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10256/16999</dc:identifier>
   <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.21500/22563202.3192</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1794-192X</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2256-3202</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
   <dc:publisher>Universidad de San Buenaventura i Editorial Bonaventuriana</dc:publisher>
   <dc:source>Revista científica Guillermo de Ockham, 2018, vol. 15, núm. 1, p. 59-65</dc:source>
   <dc:source>Articles publicats (D-FS)</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>