<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-13T04:30:40Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10230/70811" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10230/70811</identifier><datestamp>2025-07-05T22:32:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_6</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_452952</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>Economic principles for the enforcement of abuse of dominance provisions</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Fumagalli, Chiara</dc:creator>
   <dc:creator>Motta, Massimo</dc:creator>
   <dc:subject>Monopolis</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Competència -- Dret i legislació</dc:subject>
   <dc:subject>Contractes d'exclusivitat</dc:subject>
   <dcterms:abstract>The European Commission (EC) has recently announced its intention to issue Guidelines on exclusionary abuses. In this paper, we explain how economics can and should be used to inform a sound and effects-based approach in the enforcement of Article 102 TFEU. In particular, the EC should be guided only by a consumer welfare standard; exclusive dealing and exclusivity rebates should be subject to a (rebuttable) presumption of harm; price-cost tests are meaningful only for predation and other practices that do not reference rivals; essentiality of the input should not be a requirement for vertical foreclosure cases of any type, but such cases should be limited only to dominant firms that satisfy certain criteria.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:dateAccepted>2025-07-05T22:32:18Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
   <dcterms:available>2025-07-05T22:32:18Z</dcterms:available>
   <dcterms:created>2025-07-05T22:32:18Z</dcterms:created>
   <dcterms:issued>2025-07-01T14:45:10Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2025-07-01T14:45:10Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/70811</dc:identifier>
   <dc:relation>Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2024;20(1-2):85-107</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>© Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Competition Law &amp; Economics following peer review. The version of record Fumagalli C, Motta M. Economic principles for the enforcement of abuse of dominance provisions. J Compet Law Econ. 2024;20(1-2):85-107. DOI: 10.1093/joclec/nhae003 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhae003 and https://academic.oup.com/jcle/article-abstract/20/1-2/85/7631485</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>