<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-14T05:20:26Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:www.recercat.cat:10230/59361" metadataPrefix="qdc">https://recercat.cat/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:recercat.cat:10230/59361</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-24T08:35:59Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_2072_6</setSpec><setSpec>col_2072_452952</setSpec></header><metadata><qdc:qualifieddc xmlns:qdc="http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
   <dc:title>De se content and action generalisation. Philosophical papers</dc:title>
   <dc:creator>Verdejo Aparicio, Víctor Martín</dc:creator>
   <dcterms:abstract>Ever since John Perry&amp;apos;s developments in the late 70s, it is customary among philosophers to take de se contents as essentially tied to the explanation of action. The target explanation appeals to a subject-specific notion of de se content capable of capturing behavioural differences in central cases. But a subject-specific de se content leads us, I argue, to a subject-specific notion of intentional action that prevents basic forms of generalisation. Although this might be seen as a welcome revision of our pre-theoretical conceptions, I propose, instead, a strategy to circumvent this rather unexpected result: to reject subject-specific de se contents in favour of subject-specific ways of thinking that do not enter into the content of one&amp;apos;s attitudes.</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:abstract>This work has received financial&#xd;
support from the Secretary for Universities and Research of the Department of&#xd;
Economy and Knowledge (Government of Catalonia) and also from the Ministry&#xd;
of Economy and Competitiveness (Government of Spain) and the European&#xd;
Union via the research projects FFI2016-80588-R and FFI2015-63892-P (MINECO,&#xd;
AEI/FEDER, EU)</dcterms:abstract>
   <dcterms:issued>2024-03-08T07:14:08Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2024-03-08T07:14:08Z</dcterms:issued>
   <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
   <dc:relation>Philosophical papers. 2017;46(2):315-44.</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/2016-80588-R</dc:relation>
   <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/2015-63892-p</dc:relation>
   <dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor &amp;amp; Francis in Philosophical papers on 19 Dec 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/05568641.2017.1299588</dc:rights>
   <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
   <dc:publisher>Taylor &amp;amp; Francis</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>