2026-04-17T18:46:34Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:10230/544392025-12-13T21:20:22Zcom_2072_6col_2072_452952

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Grimm, Scott author McNally, Louise, 1965- author 2022-10-18T05:44:12Z 2022-10-18T05:44:12Z 2022 Nominalization (e.g., sleeping, that we slept, sleepiness) allows speakers to refer and ascribe properties to whatever sorts of entities clauses, verbs, or adjectives typically denote. Characterizing these relatively abstract entities has challenged semanticists and philosophers of language for over 50 years, thanks especially to Zeno Vendler’s early work. Vendler took different kinds of English nominalization constructions to support positing facts, propositions, and events as distinct ontological objects. However, his conclusions remain controversial. The research on nominalization and natural language ontology has never been brought together or put into perspective; in this article, we clarify the complex variety of subsequent ontological positions that build on Vendler’s work, identifying points of consensus and disagreement. We also reflect on the consequences and challenges of focusing on the English data and offer a glimpse of how the landscape might change with greater attention to nominalization in other languages. We also thank Lauren Fonteyn, Zi Huang, Paul Portner, Alessandro Zucchi, and Barbara Partee for input directly related to this article, and acknowledge support from grant FFI2016-76045-P (AEI/MINEICO/FEDER, UE) and an ICREA Academia Award to L.M. Nominalization Natural language ontology Events Facts Propositions Abstract objects Nominalization and natural language ontology