2026-04-13T05:57:24Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request
oai:recercat.cat:10230/465862025-12-24T08:32:23Zcom_2072_6col_2072_452952
RECERCAT author Muñoz Mendoza, Jordi author Anduiza Perea, Eva author Gallego Dobón, Aina 2021-02-24T09:14:32Z2021-02-24T09:14:32Z2016 Corruption cases have limited electoral consequences in many countries. Why do voters often fail to punish corrupt politicians at the polls? Previous research has focused on the role of lack of information, weak institutions and partisanship in explaining this phenomenon. In this paper, we propose three micro-mechanisms that can help understand why voters support corrupt mayors even in contexts with high information and strong institutions: implicit exchange (good performance can make up for corruption), credibility of information (accusations from opposition parties are not credible) and the lack of credible alternatives (the belief that all politicians are corrupt). We test these mechanisms using three survey experiments conducted in Catalonia. Our results suggest that implicit exchange and credibility of information help explain voters’ support for corrupt politicians.Support for this research was provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [research grant CSO2010-18534]. © This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Local Government Studies on 2016, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03003930.2016.1154847 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Corruption Voting Mayors Survey experiment Why do voters forgive corrupt mayors? Implicit exchange, credibility of information and clean alternatives info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion