2026-04-17T06:51:42Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:10230/450862025-12-18T01:16:43Zcom_2072_6col_2072_452952

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Miron, Marius author Tolan, Songül author Gómez Gutiérrez, Emilia, 1975- author Castillo, Carlos author 2020-07-08T08:35:03Z 2020-07-08T08:35:03Z 2020 In this paper we investigate risk prediction of criminal re-offense among juvenile defendants using general-purpose machine learning (ML) algorithms. We show that in our dataset, containing hundreds of cases, ML models achieve better predictive power than a structured professional risk assessment tool, the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), at the expense of not satisfying relevant group fairness metrics that SAVRY does satisfy. We explore in more detail two possible causes of this algorithmic bias that are related to biases in the data with respect to two protected groups, foreigners and women. In particular, we look at (1) the differences in the prevalence of re-offense between protected groups and (2) the influence of protected group or correlated features in the prediction. Our experiments show that both can lead to disparity between groups on the considered group fairness metrics. We observe that methods to mitigate the influence of either cause do not guarantee fair outcomes. An analysis of feature importance using LIME, a machine learning interpretability method, shows that some mitigation methods can shift the set of features that ML techniques rely on away from demographics and criminal history which are highly correlated with sensitive features. Funding was provided by Joint Research Centre (Grant No. HUMAINT). Criminal recidivism Machine learning Algorithmic fairness Risk assessment Criminal justice Automated decision making Evaluating causes of algorithmic bias in juvenile criminal recidivism