2026-04-17T05:56:56Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:10230/444082025-12-20T16:50:33Zcom_2072_6col_2072_452952

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Braun, Michael author Behr, Dorothée author Díez Medrano, Juan author 2020-05-05T09:06:08Z 2020-05-05T09:06:08Z 2018 The measurement of cosmopolitanism, i.e. the feeling of being a citizen of the world and the corresponding openness towards other cultures and peoples, has proved to be challenging and several scholars have questioned its validity. In this paper, we use web probing, i.e. implementing probing techniques of cognitive interviewing in web surveys, to elucidate the meaning of a frequently used direct measure of cosmopolitanism that asks respondents to what extent they feel they are “a citizen of the world”. As a single-item measure, it cannot be analyzed by statistical approaches such as confirmatory factor analysis. We compare results from Spain, Denmark, Hungary, Germany, Canada, and the U.S. Though the majority of the respondents show an understanding of the item which corresponds to the intention of the researchers, a large part of them does not. In addition, some country differences in the open answers make sense but other differences between countries are hard to explain. We conclude that asking people to what extent they feel they are “a citizen of the world” does not capture well the concept of cosmopolitanism as used in the literature. Cosmopolitan attitudes International comparisons Open answers Web probing What do respondents mean when they report to be "citizens of the world"? Using probing questions to elucidate international differences in cosmopolitanism