2026-04-17T17:05:36Zhttps://recercat.cat/oai/request

oai:recercat.cat:10230/233482025-12-12T02:14:53Zcom_2072_6col_2072_452952

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Sunyer Deu, Jordi author Esnaola, Mikel author Álvarez Pedrerol, Mar author Forns i Guzman, Joan, 1981- author Rivas, Ioar author López Vicente, Mònica, 1988- author Suades González, Elisabet author Foraster Pulido, Maria, 1984- author García Esteban, Raquel author Basagaña Flores, Xavier author Viana, Maria Carmen author Cirach, Marta author Moreno, Teresa author Alastuey, Andrés author Sebastián Gallés, Núria author Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J. author Querol, Xavier author 2015-04-07T09:40:39Z 2015-04-07T09:40:39Z 2015 Air pollution is a suspected developmental neurotoxicant. Many schools are located in close proximity to busy roads, and traffic air pollution peaks when children are at school. We aimed to assess whether exposure of children in primary school to traffic-related air pollutants is associated with impaired cognitive development. Methods and Findings: We conducted a prospective study of children (n = 2,715, aged 7 to 10 y) from 39 schools in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) exposed to high and low traffic-related air pollution, paired by school socioeconomic index; children were tested four times (i.e., to assess the 12-mo developmental trajectories) via computerized tests (n = 10,112). Chronic traffic air pollution (elemental carbon [EC], nitrogen dioxide [NO2], and ultrafine particle number [UFP; 10–700 nm]) was measured twice during 1-wk campaigns both in the courtyard (outdoor) and inside the classroom (indoor) simultaneously in each school pair. Cognitive development was assessed with the n-back and the attentional network tests, in particular, working memory (two-back detectability), superior working memory (three-back detectability), and inattentiveness (hit reaction time standard error). Linear mixed effects models were adjusted for age, sex, maternal education, socioeconomic status, and air pollution exposure at home. Children from highly polluted schools had a smaller growth in cognitive development than children from the paired lowly polluted schools, both in crude and adjusted models (e.g., 7.4% [95% CI 5.6%–8.8%] versus 11.5% [95% CI 8.9%–12.5%] improvement in working memory, p = 0.0024). Cogently, children attending schools with higher levels of EC, NO2, and UFP both indoors and outdoors experienced substantially smaller growth in all the cognitive measurements; for example, a change from the first to the fourth quartile in indoor EC reduced the gain in working memory by 13.0% (95% CI 4.2%–23.1%). Residual confounding for social class could not be discarded completely; however, the associations remained in stratified analyses (e.g., for type of school or high-/low-polluted area) and after additional adjustments (e.g., for commuting, educational quality, or smoking at home), contradicting a potential residual confounding explanation. Conclusions: Children attending schools with higher traffic-related air pollution had a smaller improvement in cognitive development. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the ERC Grant Agreement number 268479–the BREATHE project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript Aire -- Contaminació Infants -- Desenvolupament Association between traffic-related air pollution in schools and cognitive development in primary school children: a prospective cohort study