To access the full text documents, please follow this link: http://hdl.handle.net/2117/102033

Association between time to reperfusion and outcome is primarily driven by the time from imaging to reperfusion
Ribó, Marc; Molina, Carlos A.; Cobo Valeri, Erik; Cerda, Neus; Tomasello, Alejandro; Urra, Xabier; Sanroman, Luis; Dávalos Errando, Antoni; Jovin, Tudor G.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa; Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GRBIO - Grup de Recerca en Bioestadística i Bioinformàtica
Background and Purpose A progressive decline in the odds of favorable outcome as time to reperfusion increases is well known. However, the impact of specific workflow intervals is not clear.; Methods We studied the mechanical thrombectomy group (n=103) of the prospective, randomized REVASCAT (Randomized Trial of Revascularization With Solitaire FR Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting Within Eight Hours of Symptom Onset) trial. We defined 3 workflow metrics: time from symptom onset to reperfusion (OTR), time from symptom onset to computed tomography, and time from computed tomography (CT) to reperfusion. Clinical characteristics, core laboratory-evaluated Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (ASPECTS) and 90-day outcome data were analyzed. The effect of time on favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale, 0-2) was described via adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for every 30-minute delay.; Results Median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 17.0 (14.0-20.0), reperfusion rate was 66%, and rate of favorable outcome was 43.7%. Mean (SD) workflow times were as follows: OTR: 342 (107) minute, onset to CT: 204 (93) minute, and CT to reperfusion: 138 (56) minute. Longer OTR time was associated with a reduced likelihood of good outcome (OR for 30-minute delay, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.93). The onset to CT time did not show a significant association with clinical outcome (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67-1.12), whereas the CT to reperfusion interval showed a negative association with favorable outcome (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95). A similar subgroup analysis according to admission ASPECTS showed this relationship for OTR time in ASPECTS<8 patients (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.9) but not in ASPECTS8 (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.68-1.44).; Conclusions Time to reperfusion is negatively associated with favorable outcome, being CT to reperfusion, as opposed to onset to CT, the main determinant of this association. In addition, OTR was strongly associated to outcome in patients with low ASPECTS scores but not in patients with high ASPECTS scores.; Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01692379.
Peer Reviewed
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Matemàtica aplicada a les ciències
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Investigació operativa::Programació matemàtica
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Estadística matemàtica::Anàlisi multivariant
Combinatorial probabilities
Programming (Mathematics)
Sequences (Mathematics)
odds ratio
probability
reperfusion
stroke
thrombectomy
Acute ischemic-stroke
Endovascular reperfusion
Infarct volume
Symptom onset
therapy
thrombectomy
Trial
Probabilitats
Programació (Matemàtica)
Seqüències (Matemàtica)
Classificació AMS::60 Probability theory and stochastic processes::60C05 Combinatorial probability
Classificació AMS::90 Operations research, mathematical programming::90C Mathematical programming
Classificació AMS::62 Statistics::62L Sequential methods
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
Article
         

Show full item record

Related documents

Other documents of the same author

Dávalos Errando, Antoni; Cobo Valeri, Erik; Molina, Carlos A.; Chamorro, Ángel; de Miquel, Maria Angeles; San Román, L.; Serena Leal, Joaquín; López-Cancio, Elena; Ribó, Marc; Millán, Mónica; Urra, Xabier; Cardona, Pere; Tomasello, Alejandro; Castaño, Carlos; Blasco, Jordi; Aja, Lucia; Rublera, Marta; Gomis Cortina, Meritxell; Renú, Arturo; Lara, Blanca; Fàbregas, Joan Martí; Jankowitz, Brian; Cerdà, Neus; Jovin, Tudor G.
Molina, Carlos A.; Chamorro, Ángel; Rovira, Alex; de Miquel, Maria Angeles; Serena Leal, Joaquín; Sanroman, Luis; Jovin, Tudor G.; Dávalos Errando, Antoni; Cobo Valeri, Erik
López-Cancio, Elena; Salvat, Mercé; Cerda, Neus; Jimenez, Marta; Codas, Javier; Llull, Laura; Boned, Sara; Cano, Luis M.; Blanca, Lara; Molina, Carlos; Cobo Valeri, Erik; Dávalos Errando, Antoni; Jovin, Tudor G.; Serena Leal, Joaquín
Urra, Xabier; Abilleira, Sonia; Dorado, Laura; Marc, Ribó; Cardona, Pere; Millán, Monica; Chamorro, Ángel; Molina, Carlos; Cobo Valeri, Erik; Dávalos Errando, Antoni; Jovin, Tudor G.; Gallofre, Miquel
López-Cancio, Elena; Salvat, Mercé; Roldán, N.; Cerda, N.; Jimenez, M.; Codas, Javier; Llull, L.; Boned, Sara; Molina, C.; Cano, L.; Lara, B.; Cobo Valeri, Erik; Dávalos Errando, Antoni; Jovin, Tudor G.; Serena Leal, Joaquín
 

Coordination

 

Supporters