Para acceder a los documentos con el texto completo, por favor, siga el siguiente enlace: http://hdl.handle.net/10230/295

Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman
Bosch-Domènech, Antoni; Silvestre, Joaquim
Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament d'Economia i Empresa
We experimentally question the assertion of Prospect Theory that people display risk attraction in choices involving high-probability losses. Indeed, our experimental participants tend to avoid fair risks for large (up to ? 90), high-probability (80%) losses. Our research hinges on a novel experimental method designed to alleviate the house-money bias that pervades experiments with real (not hypothetical) loses.Our results vindicate Daniel Bernoulli?s view that risk aversion is the dominant attitude,But, contrary to the Bernoulli-inspired canonical expected utility theory, we do find frequent risk attraction for small amounts of money at stake.In any event, we attempt neither to test expected utility versus nonexpected utility theories, nor to contribute to the important literature that estimates value and weighting functions. The question that we ask is more basic, namely: do people display risk aversion when facing large losses, or large gains? And, at the risk of oversimplifying, our answer is yes.
01-03-2006
Behavioral and Experimental Economics
losses
risk attraction
risk aversion
experiments
prospect theory
bernoulli
kahneman
tversky
leex
L'accés als continguts d'aquest document queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
Documento de trabajo
         

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem