DOCUMENT DE TREBALL XREAP2011-11 Age effects, unobserved characteristics and hedonic price indexes: The Spanish car market in the 1990s Xosé-Luís Varela-Irimia (GRIT) Age e¤ects, unobserved characteristics and hedonic price indexes: The Spanish car market in the 1990’ s Xosé-Luís Varela-Irimia y Universitat Rovira i Virgili August 10, 2011 Abstract This paper computes and compares alternative quality-adjusted price indexes for new cars in Spain in the period 1990-2000. The proposed hedonic approach simultaneously controls for time-invariant unobserved product e¤ects and time-variant unobserved quality changes, that are assumed to be captured by model age e¤ects. The results show that the non-adjusted price index largely overstates the increase in the cost of living induced by changes in car prices and that previous evidence for this market have not measured the real extent of that bias, probably due to the omission of controls for unobservables. It is also shown that omitting age e¤ects can also lead to misleading conclusions. The estimated price indexes give also some insights on what could have been the determinants of price evolution in the Spanish car market. JEL classi…cation numbers: L11, L13 Keywords: Hedonic price indexes, Spanish car market, car prices, CPI, Cost of living This paper is partially based on materials from my PhD dissertation at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. y Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Departament d’ Economia, Av. Universitat, 1. 43204 Reus, Spain. Tel.:+34977759845 Fax: +34977758907 E-mail: joseluis.varela@urv.cat , http://gandalf.fcee.urv.es/professors/irimia 1 1 Introduction The consumer price index (CPI) is an economic magnitude of major interest in economic policy. From a microeconomic point of view in‡ ation increases consumer’ cost of living. s One immediate macroeconomic implication is the pressure to increase wages, which in turn has a direct impact on competitiveness. The CPI is also the basis for measuring growth and productivity in real terms, not to mention its in‡ uence in the evolution of interest rates and other …nancial variables governing for instance investment decisions at the micro and macro levels, which also in‡ uence growth rates. In this context, the correct measurement of consumer price’ changes is a fundamental issue (Boskin et al. (1998)). s The CPI is usually measured as a weighted average of the prices of a …xed basket of goods representing consumer expenditure. However, the report of the Boskin Commission has established that one of the major drawbacks of this methodology is the inability to cope with the quality change and new product biases (Boskin (1996)), therefore overstating the increase in the cost of living (Boskin et al. (1998)). The recommendations of the Boskin report have in‡ uenced statistical agencies to take the steps toward making the CPI a better approximation of a true cost of living index. They have also served to renew the interest on hedonic regressions and hedonic price indexes as a potential way of controlling for those biases. The recent literature has mainly focused on durable goods where quality upgrading is frequent and product replacement is high, such as for example cars (Reis and Silva (2006), Matas and Raymond (2009), Dalen and Bode (2004)), computers (Pakes (2003), Brown (2000)), domestic appliances (Ioannidis and Silver (2003), Silver and Heravi (2004)) or electronic devices (Chwelos et al. (2008)). These types of goods usually have a large weight in the CPI (specially in the case of cars) and therefore any adjustment in price indexes for those categories may have a relevant impact on the CPI. Hedonic price indexes are constructed based on a hedonic regression where the price of the good is explained by its characteristics. The coe¢ cients of this regression are a sort of prices for characteristics that may be used to construct an index of quality change. The price change of the good is then adjusted by this quality change to build a price index 2 free of quality or new product biases. Most of the literature considers hedonic regressions with observed product characteristics, while the impact of omitted unobserved product characteristics have received very little attention. Most authors rely on brand or make dummies hoping that this will be enough to control for product unobservables. However, Benkard and Bajari (2005) and Requena-Silvente and Walker (2006) show, using di¤erent methodologies, that not including speci…c controls for unobserved e¤ects can induce a signi…cant bias in hedonic price indexes. In this paper, following Requena-Silvente and Walker (2006) I construct a hedonic price index for cars in Spain in the 1990’ controlling for time-invariant product unobservables. I s extend their approach to control also for time-variant unobserved factors by including age or cohort controls. This has already been proposed in the literature (see for example the application to the Dutch car market of Dalen and Bode (2004) and the references therein) but the simultaneous inclusion of age and …xed e¤ects has not been tried before. As usual in this literature I …nd that price indexes are larger than quality-adjusted prices, but also that …xed e¤ects play an important role that will be misleading unless we control for age e¤ects. In particular, it is shown that in the absence of cohort e¤ects just controlling for time-invariant unobservables tends to overstate the hedonic price index by a large amount. The hedonic methodology dates back at least to the 1930’ with the pioneering work s of Court (1939) followed by the later contributions of Griliches starting from 1961. Since then, there have been theoretical and methodological developments (see Triplett (2004) or Pakes (2003) for a general perspective) and many empirical applications (see for example Bover and Izquierdo (2003) for an overview by product categories). It is not the purpose of this article to provide a full review of the literature so I will concentrate on those aspects closer to the scope of the paper. Regarding the estimation of hedonic equations, Benkard and Bajari (2005) make clear that the potential e¤ects of omitting unobserved product characteristics over the qualityadjusted hedonic price index, although recognized, have not been tackled adequately (p.61). They propose a method based on factor analysis to correct for these biases and 3 they apply it to the US personal computer market …nding that not taking into account unobserved e¤ects induces an upward bias in the hedonic index of about 1.4% per year. An alternative approach proposed by Requena-Silvente and Walker (2006) controls for product unobservables by introducing model dummies in the hedonic regressions. In their application to the UK car market they …nd that the contribution of …xed e¤ects to the value of cars has fallen since the 1970’ suggesting a downward bias in the hedonic index. s, The automobile sector has been widely studied in the hedonic price index literature, probably as a consequence of the important weight that automobiles have in consumer price indexes. Among the papers that have computed hedonic prices indexes for cars for di¤erent countries and periods of time we have: i) For the US: Court (1939), Griliches (1961) between 1954-1960, Triplett (1969) between 1960-1965 and Ohta (1987) for used cars between 1970-1983. ii) For the UK: Cowling and Cubbin (1972) between 1956-1968, Murray and Sarantis (1999) between 1977-1991 and Requena-Silvente and Walker (2006) between 1971-1998. iii) For the Netherlands: Kroonenberg and Cramer (1974) between 1964-1971 and Dalen and Bode (2004) between 1990-1999. iv) For Portugal Reis and Silva (2006) between1997-2001. v) For Italy Tomat (2002) between 1988-1998. Regarding the Spanish market Izquierdo et al. (2001) have computed hedonic prices for new cars using monthly data for the period 1997-2000. Their hedonic regressions explain prices as a function of quality indexes, constructed from a comprehensive set of 35 observed characteristics, in order to avoid the collinearity problems common to this methodology (Pakes (2003)). The main …nding is that quality corrected prices are 3.1% lower per year as compared to the price index computed by the Spanish National Statistics O¢ ce. Matas and Raymond (2009) o¤er estimates for the period 1981-2005 but using yearly, instead of monthly, data. They perform standard hedonic regressions but they also propose two di¤erent smoothing techniques to deal with the parameter instability caused by collinearity. They do not address directly the problem of product unobservables, assuming that they may be captured by brand dummies. Their results show that not controlling for quality improvements overestimates nominal price increases at an average rate of 8.8% per year for this 25 years. For the period 1997-2001 they estimate a gap of 4 around 2.85% per year, in line with the results of Izquierdo et al. (2001), although a bit smaller. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes de data and the quality improvement process of cars in Spain. Section 3 explains the methodology followed in the hedonic regressions. Section 4 presents the price indexes to be computed. Section 5 shows and discuss the results. Finally, section 6 concludes. 2 Quality improvement patterns for cars in Spain during the 1990’ s 2.1 Data Description I use a unique data set of monthly registrations of new cars in Spain from January 1990 to December 2000. These data were initially collected by, and …rst used in Moral (1999) 1 , who also provides a thorough description of the data base. It includes information on listed nominal and real prices and characteristics such as car size (length, width, luggage capacity), power, maximum speed, fuel consumption, and equipment (dummies for air conditioner, anti-lock braking system, power steering, central door locking and electric windows). It also has information on model age and on the geographical origin of the brand producing the model. Table 1 describes the set of characteristics. The unit of observation is the car model. Car models often have several variants or subvariants. In the data, a given model denomination is associated with the characteristics of its most popular variant. Therefore, the variation in characteristics over time is due to the variation of the characteristics of the representative variant (and not due to a change on the variant chosen). The number of registrations for a model are, however, the sum of registrations of all variants. Some …lters were introduced to exclude super luxury models, e.g., Ferrari or Rolls Royce. Models with fewer than 10 registrations per month are also excluded. Nevertheless, The data base there, which runs from January 1990 to December 1996, has later been extended up to December 2000. 1 5 the data set accounts for more than 99.9% of car registrations during the sample period. Models are classi…ed in segments following industry sources2 . In particular, I consider the following classi…cation in eight segments: Small-Mini, Small, Compact, Intermediate, High Intermediate, Luxury, Sport, and Minivan. The segments from Small-Mini to Luxury correspond to vertical product di¤erentiation, while Sport and Minivan can be identi…ed with the horizontal one. These two segments include cars of di¤erent levels of quality, all of them having in common that they are designed to serve a more speci…c purpose. 2.2 The evolution of automobile characteristics and prices One of the most salient features of the Spanish car market in the 1990’ is the intense s process of product entry and replacement. The number of products increases steadily over the period due to the entry of new …rms (mainly from Asia) and the expansion of the product range of incumbents. We can therefore say that the market is characterized by an scenario of increased competition, specially from Asian manufacturers (Jaumandreu and Moral (2008)). The evolution of prices and car characteristics suggests that non-price competition is the strategy followed by the majority of …rms. The average price of cars in real terms increases all over the period, except for Asian models (Figure 1), which may be due to the fact that at the beginning of the sample period Asian producers were concentrating mainly on models of the upper-class segments. As they expanded their range of products to cover segments of lower quality it is natural that the global average price decreases. The initial decline in prices (Figure 2) can be attributed to the context of economic crisis at the beginning of the decade in Spain. The quality of cars, measured by the amount of each characteristic, clearly increases all over the period, perhaps more in the case of non-Asian models. Figures 3 to 6 plot the evolution of engine power and air conditioning, which are representative of the general pattern of change of the other National Association of Automobile and Truck Manufacturers (ANFAC) Annual Report (2006), page 57. Accessible online at http://www.anfac.es . During the 1990’ the Minivan segment was still marginal s, in Spain, for that reason it was grouped in a unique category that nowadays has split into two, following the consolidation of the segment. 2 6 characteristics.3;4 The general trend goes toward larger, faster and more powerful cars but with smaller luggage capacity and higher consumption rates. This is particularly marked in the case of European models, probably as a response to the increased competition from Asian models in the second half of the decade. The average Asian car seems to follow the opposite pattern, but as mentioned before, this is mainly a consequence of the fact that the earlier Asian cars were concentrated in the upper-quality segments. After 1995 the Spanish market witnesses an intense wave of entries by Asian makers, mainly in the medium and lower quality segments. Nevertheless, Spanish, European and American manufacturers contribute also very actively to the enlargement of the number of models o¤ered in Spain. The evolution of car amenities such as air conditioning, power steering, etc. follows a similar pattern, although in this case it is very clear that improvements in these characteristics are always introduced in the upper-class segments and they eventually spread over the rest. It is important to clarify that the Minivan and Small-Mini segments became popular during this period so that the variety and number of models increased signi…cantly. As a consequence the average characteristics varied a lot due to the intense entry process, specially at the beginning of the sample period. In summary, it seems clear that the automobile sector in Spain experienced a remarkable improvement in quality which a simple price index would ignore, thus overstating the increase in the cost of living attributed to car purchases. Therefore, the application of hedonic regression techniques to the computation of price indexes seems to be clearly justi…ed. 3 Hedonic regressions The hedonic regression methodology is aimed at explaining price variations by the change in product characteristics. Its practical implementation requires choosing and justifyThese …gures are omitted here for the sake of brevity. They are available from the author upon request. 4 All the …gures presented here are weighted by unit sales. 3 7 ing assumptions regarding model speci…cation, functional form of the hedonic function, parameter constancy or weighting. The next subsections address each of these issues. 3.1 Model speci…cation The most basic hedonic speci…cation relates price to characteristics: pit = 0t + Xit t + "it (1) where 0 is an intercept, Xi is a row vector of product i observed characteristics, is the vector of implicit prices and "i is some iid error term. In some cases the researcher may have access to a thorough set of product characteristics, comprehensive enough to justify the assumption that there remains no unobserved characteristic and the model is well speci…ed. However, in most cases the set of characteristics is much more limited and observability becomes an issue. And even if we had such an exhaustive set of characteristics we could always think of factors like reliability, consumer’ perception of quality or s reputation that have an e¤ect on prices but are not speci…cally captured by any combination of technical characteristics. If these factors are also correlated with the observed characteristics then their omission would make the estimation of 0 s inconsistent. One approach that has become common to address this problem consists on adding brand or make dummies, hoping that reputation or reliability will be adequately captured: pit = 0t + Xit t + Brand t + "it (2) where Brand is a row vector of make dummies taking value 1 in the position corresponding to the brand of product i and zero otherwise. This set of dummies may be augmented in some cases, like the automobile sector, with the addition of segment dummies: pit = 0t + Xit t + Brand t + Seg t + "it (3) 8 where Seg is interpreted in the same manner than Brand , but now for segments. Unfortunately, even with brand or segment dummies there may remain unobserved factors speci…c to model i. One possible solution would be to introduce product speci…c dummies ( ) to capture such e¤ects: pit = 0t + Xit t + M odel t + "it (4) However, if the number of products is large this approach could be problematic due to the lack of degrees of freedom. An alternative solution would specify a model with a time-invariant product …xed e¤ect ( i ): pit = Xit t + i + "it (5) The estimated prices for characteristics, , would be the same in approaches 4 and 5 (Cameron and Trivedi (2005) section 21.6.4, p.732). Approaches 1-3 are common in the literature and approach 4 has been proposed by Requena-Silvente and Walker (2006). In this paper I will compare the results from all of them, but using the speci…cation 5 instead of 4. Regarding the choice of characteristics in X the common approach has been using as many as there are available. However, the potential collinearity between many of these characteristics can induce some problems in the estimation of ’ , notably the appearance s of “wrong” signs or parameter instability. Nevertheless, following Pakes (2003), these problems have not been a particular source of worry in the literature. Therefore, in my empirical speci…cation I will be using all characteristics listed in Table 1.5 Among them, the role of age deserves particular attention. The variable age, measures the age of the product, i.e., the period of time elapsed since it was …rstly introduced in the market. So, for a given year, the variable age informs about 5 A few more characteristics were originally available, but they were either almost perfectly collinear with or just simple rede…nitions of other variables like horse power, fuel consumption or car size, so they were not considered. The hedonic indexes, however, are quite robust to variations in the contents of X, except in what concerns the variable age (see section 5). 9 the vintage of the product and its particular level of technical change (for example, older products could be technically less developed). But age also informs about the degree of obsolescence of the product, or its reputation among consumers (older products could be seen as more successful). In summary, the age can be informative about product speci…c (quality) characteristics that cannot be inferred from the observed technical speci…cations and that can also be time-variant (see the discussion in Dalen and Bode (2004)). Therefore introducing age as an explanatory variable can help in controlling for unobserved e¤ects in combination with i in expression 5. The latter would control for time-invariant product speci…c unobserved e¤ects, while the former would capture the time-variant ones that are common to the products of the same age. After these controls are introduced it does not seem implausible to assume that all relevant sources of (time-variant or -invariant) unobserved product heterogeneity are being accounted for. If product unobservables are really an issue then the estimation of expressions 1-3 should yield biased estimates of . The introduction or not of age would just a¤ect the size of the bias. In speci…cation 5 however, the omission of age could introduce some bias and its inclusion should remove it. If the time-variant unobserved e¤ects are correlated with X then omitting them would induce correlation between X and the error term. The size and direction of these biases are empirical questions that depend on the correspondent estimates of the e¤ects. 3.2 Functional form of the hedonic function In the previous subsections linear expressions of the hedonic regression have been used for simplicity in the exposition. However, the relation between prices and characteristics could follow any general functional form: pit = f (Xit ) . Nevertheless, the literature has focused on linear relations but allowing for the possibility of transforming the data to have a more ‡ exible speci…cation. The usual approach has consisted on applying a Box-Cox transformation to the dependent and/or the right hand side variables and estimating the transformation parameters consistent with the data. It turns out that in most cases the Box-Cox parameters are close enough to 0 or 1 to safely assume semi-log, log-log or simple 10 linear speci…cations. Therefore, most of the work of functional form selection reduces to determining the best suitable transformation of the data. Regarding the automobile industry previous studies have found that a semi-log speci…cation (taking logs on the price and leaving the right hand side variables unchanged) is the one that best …ts the data, it is the case of Dalen and Bode (2004) or RequenaSilvente and Walker (2006). For the Spanish market, Matas and Raymond (2009) also …nd the semi-log the most adequate choice. That will also be the one I will use in this paper. This choice is sustained by the fact that the maximum likelihood estimates for the parameters of the Box-Cox transform on a regression of price on characteristics for the whole sample yield a parameter of 0:013 (p-value 0:116) for price and 1:14 for the right hand side variables (the dummies are excluded from the transformation). Therefore the assumption of linearity for right hand side variables and logs for price does not seem unreasonable.6 3.3 Parameter constancy and the use of weights in hedonic regressions The hedonic price index methods can be applied following di¤erent estimation strategies that are basically di¤erentiated by the sample size they use: 1. The time dummy variable (TDV) method …ts the hedonic regression to the whole sample, adding to the model speci…cation a set of time dummies. The idea is that the coe¢ cient of the dummy of say, period t, will represent the growth in the price index from the initial period to time t net of quality changes, which are controlled for through the variation of characteristics. The main drawback of this method is that it restricts the coe¢ cients (prices) of characteristics to be constant over the whole sample period. Even if one could consider that this assumption would be reasonable for short sample periods or in contexts where consumer perception and Similar results were obtained for per-period regressions, although in this case the Box-Cox coe¢ cient on the right hand side variables was estimated less precisely in some periods, but it was in general signi…cantly di¤erent from zero. 6 11 valuation of quality remain constant over time, the truth is that in the literature parameter constancy is most often rejected by Chow tests of structural break. The case of the automobile industry is not an exception. 2. The adjacent period (AP) method can be seen as a re…nement of the TDV where parameter constancy is assumed to hold only for two consecutive periods and a dummy is added to capture the quality-adjusted price increase of the second period with respect to the …rst one. A whole index series can then be constructed by chaining the time dummies coe¢ cients. 3. The single period equation (SP) method allows the prices of characteristics to vary from period to period. Its parameter estimates can then be used to construct indexes of quality change which serve to correct the quality bias of the non-adjusted price index. One potential drawback of this approach is, as mentioned before, the parameter instability on the estimated prices of characteristics. However, the quality-adjusted price indexes constructed from them seem to be quite robust in general (Pakes (2003)). In this study I will follow the single period equation approach, that has gained in popularity precisely because it avoids the assumption of parameter constancy, which is not recommended unless it is sustained by the data (Triplett (2004) p.61). This is generally not a problem in the AP method, however this paper is aimed at assessing the impact of unobservables on price indexes, rather than comparing the results of SP and AP methods7 (see again for examples Triplett (2004) pp.61-63). Another point of debate in the hedonic literature is whether the hedonic regressions should be weighted or not. In this respect, and following the recommendations in Triplett (2004) I will make use of weights to avoid an excessive impact of prices of products whose market share is low because they are viewed as less satisfactory by consumers. The price variation of these type of goods should have less importance than other more successful 7 For the same reason I will not consider here the matched model approach. 12 models.8 3.4 Estimation issues Taking into account all considerations of the previous subsections, the …nal hedonic speci…cations to be taken to the data are: ln p = 0 + 1 C90 + 2 CarSize + 3 LGC + 4 HP + 5 maxSp + 6 Age + (6) + 7 AC + 8 ABS + 9 P ST + 10 CDL + 11 EW +" ln p = 0 + 1 C90 + 2 CarSize + 3 LGC + 4 HP + 5 maxSp + 6 Age + +" (7) + 7 AC + 8 ABS + 9 P ST + 10 CDL + 11 EW + X k k Brandk ln p = 0 + 1 C90 + 2 CarSize + 3 LGC + 4 HP + 5 maxSp + 6 Age + + (8) + + 7 AC + 8 ABS + 9 P ST + 10 CDL + 11 EW + X s s SEGs +" X k k Brandk ln p = 0 + 1 C90 + 2 CarSize + 3 LGC + 4 HP + 5 maxSp + 6 Age + (9) + 7 AC + 8 ABS + 9 P ST + 10 CDL + 11 EW + +" where Brand and SEG denote sets of dummies to control for brand and segment e¤ects, respectively. Assuming that observed characteristics are exogenous, expressions 6 - 8 can be estimated period to period by ordinary least squares. Expression 9 requires at least two periods to control for the unobserved component . Therefore, in the estimation of 9 I follow the approach proposed in Matas and Raymond (2009) of taking moving samples of order h. They suggest this procedure as a way to smooth the estimated 8 I have check however the results using no weights and the impact over the hedonic price indexes turns out to be not substantial. 13 coe¢ cients of single period hedonic regressions, that tend to be erratic from period to period. This method has the added advantage of providing enough time observations for the application of the within estimator9 in equation 9. It should be clari…ed that this approach allows di¤erent prices for characteristics every period, except for the …rst h 1 periods. What is assumed is that the coe¢ cients of period t can be satisfactorily h + 1 to t. In this subsample the prices for estimated by pooling all periods from t characteristics from t h + 1 to t 1 are held equal to those in period t. Next, for the estimation of period t + 1 the coe¢ cients of t + 1 will be assumed to hold for the previous t h + 2 to t periods, and so on. So, contrary to what happens in the AP or TDV approaches, holding the coe¢ cients constant is a manner of improving the estimation of the per-period coe¢ cients. It is assumed that for the estimation of t t the previous h + 1 periods contain useful information, and that we can take advantage of it even if h + 1 periods. we “temporarily” impose the coe¢ cients of period t over the previous t In the AP or TDV methods the sample remains constant and so do the coe¢ cients within the sample. The order of the moving sample, h, should be of a size just enough to control for the …xed e¤ect, and not too large to avoid an excessive smoothing. For the empirical application I have chosen h = 12 because for shorter samples many of the characteristics are usually constant and therefore their coe¢ cients could not be separately identi…ed from the …xed e¤ect. Recall that we are using here monthly data and that even if there is a signi…cant rate of product change and improvement, many models do not experiment changes in their technical speci…cations from one month to the next one.10 By …xing h = 12 we are assuming a one-year moving sample11 , which may be seen as a bit ad-hoc but which is also consistent with all studies using yearly data to estimate hedonic prices The within estimator for a …xed e¤ects model is an ordinary least squares estimator of a model where the original variables are substituted by their within transformation, which consists on subtracting to PT 1 w each variable its time mean, i.e, for a variable yit its within transformation is: yit = yit T t=1 yit , where T is the number of time periods for the cross-section unit i. The within transformation is therefore a way of removing the …xed e¤ect from the data. 10 This is also the main reason for not computing price indexes using the AP hedonic approach. 11 The hedonic indexes are quite robust to the choice of h. For instance, there is not much di¤erence between those computed for values of h = 6; 12; 24 . However, for h = 6 still many characteristics remained constant preventing the estimation of their hedonic prices, and h = 24 seems perhaps a too long period to impose the equality of parameters to the moving sample. 9 14 for characteristics.12 To make the results more comparable I will estimate speci…cations 6 - 8 using the moving sample of order 12 13 4 Quality-adjusted price indexes I use a unit sales weighted Laspeyres geometric index14 , as proposed in Feenstra (1995), to measure the price increase of automobiles. The quality-adjusted index for model i is therefore de…ned as: ln Iit = ln pit ln pit 1 (Xit Xit 1 ) t (10) where Qit = (Xit Xit 1 ) t represents the quality correction and can be interpreted as a characteristics quantity index (Triplett (2004) p.60). Notice that all time-invariant characteristics, such as brand and segment dummies or individual …xed e¤ects, cancel out in Qit . Thus, the di¤erences between the alternative quality-adjusted price indexes proposed come from the di¤erent estimates of ’ in each speci…cation. In order to mitigate s the potential impact of coe¢ cient instability in the single period hedonic regressions over the indexes I smooth the ’ using a weighted moving average of coe¢ cients or order s k = 3 as proposed in Matas and Raymond (2009).15 Therefore, the smoothed coe¢ cient for characteristic j in period t is: ^ smooth = jt 12 13 t 1 jt 1 ^ + t jt ^ + t+1 jt+1 ^ Although it is true that in these cases there is no alternative choice given the data constraints. The hedonic indexes from 6 - 8 computed using single period hedonic regressions are virtually identical to those using the moving sample. 14 One advantage of using characteristics price indexes is that the functional form of the hedonic speci…cation is not linked to the index number formula (Triplett (2004), p.60). If we were following the TDV or AP approaches the use of semi-log hedonic speci…cations would imply that a geometric index would be a must rather than a choice. 15 It must be said, however, that smoothing does not have any signi…cative impact over the hedonic price indexes because the results were essentially identical for orders of smoothing of 3, 7, 13 and 1 (no smoothing). 15 where ^ jt denotes the estimate of jt and t The aggregated index is the weighted sum: nt X i=1 [var( ^ )] = X jt . t+1 1 [var( ^ js )] s=t 1 1 It = exp sit 1 ln Iit ! (11) where nt is the number of models in period t and sit is the market share of model i in nt X period t, such that sit = 1. This is the kind of approach followed by the Spanish i=1 National Statistics O¢ ce (see for example Izquierdo et al. (2001)). The indexes (11) are then chained to construct a whole series. I use as reference the non-quality-adjusted index, comparing it to adjusted indexes from each of the four speci…cations (6 - 9). 5 Results The hedonic speci…cations 6-9 were estimated for each period.16 The estimated coe¢ cients had in general the right sign, although a few variables showed reversed signs for certain periods, most likely due to the collinearity between characteristics frequently reported in the literature (Pakes (2003)). The size of coe¢ cients (in absolute value) also varies over time, but changes tend to be smooth from period to period.17 This may be a consequence of having monthly regressions, because even if we can expect parameter instability (as usually found in the literature), it should be smaller between two consecutive months than between two consecutive years. It is not unreasonable to expect that consumers’valuation of characteristics do not change much within a year, and that would be consistent with obtaining very similar results for price indexes using di¤erent orders of smoothing of the hedonic parameters. The quality-adjusted hedonic price indexes resulting from the estimation of speci…caGiven the choice of h and k, the …nal number of periods available for hedonic regressions is T = 132 h + 1 = 121 and for the computation of indexes is T = 132 h k + 2 = 119. The …gures take as base period the …rst one available, i.e., t = h + k 1 = 14 (February 1991). 17 The presentation of results from the estimation of the single period hedonic regressions is omitted due to the exaggerate length of the tables, but they are available from the author. 16 16 tions 6-9 are presented in Figure 7, the non-adjusted index is also included for comparison.18 We can see that correcting for quality using dummies for brand or segment has a strong impact, in line with the results generally reported in the literature and similar to those reported by Izquierdo et al. (2001) or Matas and Raymond (2009) for the Spanish market. The important …nding is however that not taking into account unobserved e¤ects largely overestimates the dummy-corrected indexes. Indeed, the index coming from the …xed e¤ects speci…cation shows that quality-adjusted prices remained basically constant for the whole period. By the end of 2000 the di¤erence between the …xed-e¤ects- and the brand-dummies-corrected indexes is about 18% and the di¤erence with respect to the non-adjusted index is around 35%. This represents an average year-on-year di¤erence of 1:8% and 3:5%, respectively. Taking into account that the purchase price of new cars had at that time a weight of 5:27% in the Spanish consumer price index19 (IPC) we can say that omitting observed and unobserved quality improvements in automobiles would have led to an overestimation of the IPC of almost a 0:2% per year during the 1990’ s. Interestingly, the omission of age e¤ects has a striking in‡ uence over the …xed-e¤ectsadjusted hedonic index. Actually, not including model age as an additional characteristic would lead to opposite conclusions as the adjusted and non-adjusted indexes would follow similar patterns. This result shows that the omission of time-variant unobserved e¤ects can be an important source of bias, which would be more relevant in the case of …xed e¤ects speci…cation than in the dummy variables one. As discussed in subsection 3.1 we can expect that not introducing age in speci…cations 6-8 would just a¤ect the size of the bias of hedonic coe¢ cients, while in speci…cation 9 that omission would give rise to some bias. The results without age e¤ects show a similar pattern than those reported for the UK by Requena-Silvente and Walker (2006). They …nd that …xed e¤ects push-up the hedonic index with respect to the brand dummies case and they attribute the result to the fact that the value of unobserved components is decreasing over time. In our case it seems These are all nominal indexes. This is the weight for the index with base in 1992 computed until 2001. It has been obtained from the website of the Spanish National Statistics O¢ ce, accessed on August 4, 2011 at: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/tabla.do?path=/t25/p138/pond/l1/&…le=02003.px&type=pcaxis by selecting the class “610.Purchase of vehicles for personal transport” and the period “weighting CPI-92” . 19 18 17 that age e¤ects are in general positive,20 suggesting that the quality of cars perceived by the consumers is improving even if this is not re‡ ected in the characteristics observed by the econometrician (Dalen and Bode (2004)). Therefore, the omission of age e¤ects would tend to underestimate quality improvement thus overestimating quality-adjusted prices. The estimated age coe¢ cients in the …xed e¤ects speci…cation are much larger21 than the corresponding coe¢ cients in the dummy speci…cations, so their omission also induces a much larger upward bias in the quality-adjusted index in the …xed e¤ects case than in the brand and brand-segment dummies cases. In particular, the hedonic coe¢ cients of age under …xed e¤ects take their largest values between January 1993 and April 1996. Their omission determines the strikingly di¤erent pattern of the hedonic price index between …gures 7 and 8 in that period. I have used the coe¢ cient estimates of the hedonic speci…cations to construct price indexes by car model geographic origin and segment.22;23 The objective is to determine whether the behavior of prices is determined by the evolution of any particular type of models. Figures 9-12 report the results for car models from Spain, Europe (excluding Spain), Asia and America. Asian cars are clearly leaders in (…xed e¤ects) quality-adjusted price reductions with a 20% drop in the whole sample period. American cars also reduced their quality-adjusted price while the Spanish and European ones increased between 3% and 8% . However, for making comparisons we must take into account that the average price at the initial period was di¤erent across geographic origins. Asian cars where on The coe¢ cient of age is positive for most of the per-period regressions. It is negative for periods 18 to 47 (June 1991 to November 1993) and 131-132 (November to December 2000) in the brand dummies speci…cation; for periods 18 to 65 (June 1991 to July 1994), 97 to 107 (January to November 1998) and 131-132 in the brand and segment dummies speci…cation; for periods 28 to 35 (April 1992 to November 1992) and 95 to 120 (November 1997 to December 1999) in the …xed e¤ects speci…cation. Therefore, we can say that the pattern of signs for age e¤ects is similar across speci…cations. It is also consistent with previous evidence: Dalen and Bode (2004) also …nd positive age e¤ects that change to negative between 1990 and 1994 for the Dutch car market. 21 Around ten times larger. 22 This means that no segment- or origin-speci…c hedonic regressions were run to construct these indexes. The scarcity of observations in several classes prevents the implementation of this approach. This is also the reason for some volatile patterns displayed for example in segments like Minivan or Small-Mini, or for car models original from Spain. In these cases and for some periods, due to the relatively small number of products, the entry or exit of just one product can have an big impact on the index. 23 These are all weighted indexes. The weights sum to 1 within each class considered. For example, in the …gure for European cars (Figure 10) the weights assigned to each model are per period market shares conditional on being a European car. 20 18 average most expensive at the beginning of the sample (Figure 1) and we could expect that as more models were introduced in lower-class segments the average price would fall even if the quality improvement was not too high. So let’ look for example at the s beginning of 1995, where the average real price of Asian and European cars was roughly the same, around 12000 Euro. The real price of Asian cars remained roughly constant, while European cars increased around a 10%. In the same period, …xed e¤ects, qualityadjusted prices for Asian cars fell by a 7% while European ones fell by less than 4% Therefore, even starting from similar price ranges, Asian cars seem to have improved in quality faster than the rest. The increasing competitive pressure from these models may have served to discipline the European makers towards better products to retain their market shares. Figure 10 shows that between mid-1995 and the end of 1997 the …xed e¤ects quality-adjusted price of European cars fell down sharply after three years of increase (the brand and segment dummies approaches also show that pattern, although it spreads over two more years, until the end of 1999), probably as a response to the wave of entry of models from Asian manufacturers that took place after 1995. Spanish and American models kept their …xed e¤ects quality-adjusted prices more or less constant (Figures 9 and 12). These indexes show however some jumps that can be attributed to the smaller number of models in these categories, specially for Spanish cars, that make the indexes more sensitive to product entry or exit. The indexes for each segment shown in …gures 13 to 15 have been computed following the same approach than for the by-origin …gures. To make the exposition more concise, I present only the results for the most popular segments, the Small, Compact and HighIntermediate, that account for around 70% of the market. However, their examination does not indicate that there is a speci…c segment leading price reductions. Qualityadjusted prices tend to increase in the …rst half of the sample and then start to decrease around 1995. The intensity of price increases and decreases is obviously di¤erent across segments but the general impression is that both trends are roughly uniformly distributed across segments. 19 6 Concluding remarks The use of hedonic regressions to compute quality-adjusted price indexes is nowadays a common practice in the economics literature. Nevertheless, the impact of unobserved product characteristics in that analysis has been largely neglected. Based on RequenaSilvente and Walker (2006) I propose an approach that serves to compute such indexes taking into account the existence of both time-variant and time-invariant unobserved e¤ects and I apply it to the Spanish car market. The former are controlled by introducing model age as an additional characteristic, the latter are accounted for by using …xed e¤ects panel data estimators. Although both approaches have been separately proposed in the literature they have not been used simultaneously. The results show that the estimated indexes for the Spanish automobile market can be even lower than what had already been reported, suggesting that the consumer price index could have been overestimated by a 0:2% per year, which constitutes an important bias considering its importance in measuring productivity changes or in determining wage increases. Controlling for age e¤ects turns out to be crucial for obtaining these results, implying that time-variant unobserved e¤ects are as important as the time-invariant ones, at least in what concerns the Spanish car market. Extending the analysis to the segment and geographical origin level leads to two additional conclusions: First, that the patterns of price evolution are similar across segments, such that price increases or decreases seem to be distributed uniformly across segments, i.e., price increases or decreases do not seem to be concentrated on a particular segment. Second, the price decrease of both the non-adjusted and the adjusted price indexes in the second half of the decade seems to be motivated by the strength of competition after an intense wave of new entries of Asian models. Asian cars show by far the largest price reductions, specially due to their strong quality improvements. It seems plausible to interpret the price reductions of Spanish and European incumbents as a response to that pressure, although a more formal analysis would be needed to clearly determine to what extent this is the case. 20 References Benkard, C. L. and Bajari, P. (2005) Hedonic price indexes with unobserved product characteristics, an application to personal computers, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23, 61– 75. Boskin, M. J., Dulberger, E. R., Gordon, R. J., Griliches, Z. and Jorgenson, D. W. (1998) Consumer prices, the consumer price index, and the cost of living, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 3– 26. Boskin, M. J. C. (1996) Toward a more accurate measure of the cost of living, Tech. rep., Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index, Washington, DC., interim Report to the Senate Finance Committee. Bover, O. and Izquierdo, M. (2003) Quality-adjusted prices: Hedonic methods and implications for national accounts, Investigaciones Económicas, 27, 199– 238. Brown, K. H. (2000) Hedonic price indexes and the distribution of buyers across the product space: An application to mainframe computers, Applied Economics, 32, 1801– 1808. Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications, Cambridge University Press, New York. Chwelos, P. D., Berndt, E. R. and Cockburn, I. M. (2008) Faster, smaller, cheaper: An hedonic price analysis of pdas, Applied Economics, 40, 2839– 2856. Court, A. (1939) Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples, in The dynamics of automobile demand, General Motors Corporation, pp. 99– 117. Cowling, K. and Cubbin, J. (1972) Hedonic price indexes for United Kingdom cars, Economic Journal, 82, 963– 978. Dalen, J. v. and Bode, B. (2004) Quality-corrected price indices: The case of the Dutch new passenger car market, 1990-1999, Applied Economics, 36, 1169– 1197. 21 Feenstra, R. C. (1995) Exact hedonic price indexes, Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 634– 653. Griliches, Z. (1961) Sta¤ papers 3. hedonic price indexes for automobiles: An econometric of quality change, in The Price Statistics of the Federal Goverment, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Chapters, pp. 173– 196. Ioannidis, C. and Silver, M. (2003) Chained, exact and superlative hedonic price changes: Estimates from microdata, Applied Economics, 35, 1005– 1014. Izquierdo, M., Licandro, O. and Maydeu, A. (2001) Car quality improvements and price indices in Spain, Documento de Trabajo 2001-18, FEDEA. Jaumandreu, J. and Moral, M. J. (2008) Identifying oligopoly pricing behavior: Incumbents’reaction to tari¤s dismantling, mimeo, Universidad Carlos III. Kroonenberg, N. and Cramer, J. S. (1974) A hedonic price index for the Dutch car market, De Economist, 122, 357– 366. Matas, A. and Raymond, J.-L. (2009) Hedonic prices for cars: an application to the Spanish car market, 1981-2005, Applied Economics, 41, 2887– 2904. Moral, M. J. (1999) Oligopoly Models with Di¤erentiated Product: Applications in the Automobile Market in Spain, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Murray, J. and Sarantis, N. (1999) Price-quality relations and hedonic price indexes for cars in the United Kingdom, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 5– 27. Ohta, M. (1987) Gasoline cost and hedonic price indexes of U.S. used cars for 1970-1983, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 5, 521– 528. Pakes, A. (2003) A reconsideration of hedonic price indexes with an application to PC’ s, The American Economic Review, 93, 1578– 1596. 22 Reis, H. J. and Silva, J. S. (2006) Hedonic prices indexes for new passenger cars in Portugal (1997-2001), Economic Modelling, 23, 890– 908. Requena-Silvente, F. and Walker, J. (2006) Calculating hedonic price indices with unobserved product attributes: An application to the UK car market, Economica, 73, 509– 532. Silver, M. and Heravi, S. (2004) Hedonic price indexes and the matched models approach, The Manchester School, 72, 24– 49. Tomat, G. M. (2002) Durable goods, price indexes and quality change: An application to automobile prices in Italy, 1988-1998, Working Paper 118, European Central Bank. Triplett, J. (2004) Handbook on hedonic indexes and quality adjustments in price indexes: Special application to information technology products, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2004/9, OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Triplett, J. E. (1969) Automobiles and hedonic quality measurement, The Journal of Political Economy, 77, 408– 417. 23 Tables Table 1: Characteristics and units of measure Characteristic: Price (p) Car Size (CarSize) Power (HP) Fuel Consumption (C90) Luggage Capacity (LGC) Maximum Speed (maxSp) Age Air Conditioner (AC) Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) Power Steering (PST) Central Door Locking (CDL) Electric Windows (EW) Unit of measure Thousand euros Length width (m2 ) Horse power Liters per 100 Km Liters Km per hour Number of months since the model was introduced Dummy Dummy Dummy Dummy Dummy 24 Figures Spain Europe 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 13 12 11 10 1990 Asia Real price 1995 2000 13 12 1990 America 1995 2000 16 14 11 12 10 9 1990 1995 2000 1990 1995 2000 10 Y ear Figure 1: Average real price by origin Small-Mini Small Compact Intermediate 8 8 12 11.5 14 13 7 7.5 11 6 7 10.5 10 1990 Luxury 12 11 1990 Sport Real price 5 1990 17 16 15 14 13 1990 1995 2000 1995 2000 6.5 1995 2000 1995 2000 25 1990 1995 2000 High Intermediate MiniVan 30 28 26 24 22 1990 1995 2000 30 25 20 20 15 15 1990 1995 2000 10 1990 1995 2000 Y ear Figure 2: Average real price by segment 25 Small-Mini Small Compact Intermediate 55 68 66 64 105 100 110 50 105 95 45 90 100 Horse Power 40 1990 1995 2000 High Intermediate 62 1990 1995 2000 Luxury 85 1990 1995 2000 Sport 95 1990 1995 2000 MiniVan 130 125 120 180 170 160 170 160 150 140 130 1990 1995 2000 1990 1995 2000 140 130 120 110 100 1990 1995 2000 115 110 1990 1995 2000 150 Year Figure 3: Average horse power by segment Small-Mini Small Compact Intermediate .015 .2 .3 .6 .01 .1 .005 .2 .4 .1 .2 Air Conditioned 0 1990 1 .8 .6 1995 2000 0 1990 Luxury 0 1995 2000 1 1990 Sport 0 1995 2000 1 .8 1990 1995 2000 High Intermediate MiniVan 1 .9 .8 .7 .8 .6 .4 .4 .6 1990 1995 2000 1990 1995 2000 .6 1990 1995 2000 .2 1990 1995 2000 Year Figure 4: Average proportion of cars with air conditioner by segment 26 Spain Europe 80 75 70 105 100 95 90 Horse Power 65 1990 Asia 85 1995 2000 1990 America 1995 2000 120 100 95 90 85 1990 1995 2000 1990 1995 2000 110 100 90 Year Figure 5: Average horse power by origin Spain Europe .15 .1 .05 .4 .3 .2 .1 1990 Asia Air Conditioned 0 1995 2000 1990 America 1995 2000 .5 .4 .3 .2 1990 1995 2000 .25 .2 .15 .1 .05 1990 1995 2000 Year Figure 6: Average proportion of cars with air conditioner by origin 27 1.4 1.3 Index 1.2 1.1 1 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effec ts 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjus ted index Brand and s egment dummi es Brand dummies No dummies nor fixed effects Figure 7: Hedonic price indexes 1.4 1.3 Index 1.2 1.1 1 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effec ts 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjus ted index Brand and s egment dummi es Brand dummies No dummies nor fixed effects Figure 8: Hedonic price indexes without taking into account age e¤ects 28 1.4 1.3 1.2 Index 1.1 1 .9 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effec ts No dummies nor fixed effects 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjus ted index Brand and s egment dummi es Brand dummies Figure 9: Hedonic price indexes by origin of car model: Spain 1.4 1.3 Index 1.2 1.1 1 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effec ts 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjus ted index Brand and s egment dummi es Brand dummies No dummies nor fixed effects Figure 10: Hedonic price indexes by origin of car model: Europe 29 1.1 1 Index .9 .8 .7 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effec ts No dummies nor fixed effects 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjus ted index Brand and s egment dummi es Brand dummies Figure 11: Hedonic price indexes by origin of car model: Asia 1.4 1.3 1.2 Index 1.1 1 .9 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effec ts No dummies nor fixed effects 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjus ted index Brand and s egment dummi es Brand dummies Figure 12: Hedonic price indexes by origin of car model: America 30 1.4 1.3 Index 1.2 1.1 1 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effects 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjusted index Brand and segment dummies Brand dummies No dummies nor fixed effects Figure 13: Hedonic price indexes for the Small segment 1.4 1.3 Index 1.2 1.1 1 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effects 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjusted index Brand and segment dummies Brand dummies No dummies nor fixed effects Figure 14: Hedonic price indexes for the Compact segment 1.4 1.3 1.2 Index 1.1 1 .9 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Fixed effects No dummies nor fixed effects 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Non adjusted index Brand and segment dummies Brand dummies Figure 15: Hedonic price indexes for the High-Intermediate segment 31 SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP 2006 CREAP2006-01 Matas, A. (GEAP); Raymond, J.Ll. (GEAP) "Economic development and changes in car ownership patterns" (Juny 2006) CREAP2006-02 Trillas, F. (IEB); Montolio, D. (IEB); Duch, N. (IEB) "Productive efficiency and regulatory reform: The case of Vehicle Inspection Services" (Setembre 2006) CREAP2006-03 Bel, G. (PPRE-IREA); Fageda, X. (PPRE-IREA) "Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis" (Octubre 2006) CREAP2006-04 Fernàndez-Villadangos, L. (PPRE-IREA) "Are two-part tariffs efficient when consumers plan ahead?: An empirical study" (Octubre 2006) CREAP2006-05 Artís, M. (AQR-IREA); Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA); Suriñach, J. (AQR-IREA) "Job losses, outsourcing and relocation: Empirical evidence using microdata" (Octubre 2006) CREAP2006-06 Alcañiz, M. (RISC-IREA); Costa, A.; Guillén, M. (RISC-IREA); Luna, C.; Rovira, C. "Calculation of the variance in surveys of the economic climate” (Novembre 2006) CREAP2006-07 Albalate, D. (PPRE-IREA) "Lowering blood alcohol content levels to save lives: The European Experience” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-08 Garrido, A. (IEB); Arqué, P. (IEB) “The choice of banking firm: Are the interest rate a significant criteria?” (Desembre 2006) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP CREAP2006-09 Segarra, A. (GRIT); Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (GRIT) "Productivity growth and competition in spanish manufacturing firms: What has happened in recent years?” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-10 Andonova, V.; Díaz-Serrano, Luis. (CREB) "Political institutions and the development of telecommunications” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-11 Raymond, J.L.(GEAP); Roig, J.L.. (GEAP) "Capital humano: un análisis comparativo Catalunya-España” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-12 Rodríguez, M.(CREB); Stoyanova, A. (CREB) "Changes in the demand for private medical insurance following a shift in tax incentives” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-13 Royuela, V. (AQR-IREA); Lambiri, D.; Biagi, B. "Economía urbana y calidad de vida. Una revisión del estado del conocimiento en España” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-14 Camarero, M.; Carrion-i-Silvestre, J.LL. (AQR-IREA).;Tamarit, C. "New evidence of the real interest rate parity for OECD countries using panel unit root tests with breaks” (Desembre 2006) CREAP2006-15 Karanassou, M.; Sala, H. (GEAP).;Snower , D. J. "The macroeconomics of the labor market: Three fundamental views” (Desembre 2006) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP 2007 XREAP2007-01 Castany, L (AQR-IREA); López-Bazo, E. (AQR-IREA).;Moreno , R. (AQR-IREA) "Decomposing differences in total factor productivity across firm size” (Març 2007) XREAP2007-02 Raymond, J. Ll. (GEAP); Roig, J. Ll. (GEAP) “Una propuesta de evaluación de las externalidades de capital humano en la empresa" (Abril 2007) XREAP2007-03 Durán, J. M. (IEB); Esteller, A. (IEB) “An empirical analysis of wealth taxation: Equity vs. Tax compliance” (Juny 2007) XREAP2007-04 Matas, A. (GEAP); Raymond, J.Ll. (GEAP) “Cross-section data, disequilibrium situations and estimated coefficients: evidence from car ownership demand” (Juny 2007) XREAP2007-05 Jofre-Montseny, J. (IEB); Solé-Ollé, A. (IEB) “Tax differentials and agglomeration economies in intraregional firm location” (Juny 2007) XREAP2007-06 Álvarez-Albelo, C. (CREB); Hernández-Martín, R. “Explaining high economic growth in small tourism countries with a dynamic general equilibrium model” (Juliol 2007) XREAP2007-07 Duch, N. (IEB); Montolio, D. (IEB); Mediavilla, M. “Evaluating the impact of public subsidies on a firm’s performance: a quasi-experimental approach” (Juliol 2007) XREAP2007-08 Segarra-Blasco, A. (GRIT) “Innovation sources and productivity: a quantile regression analysis” (Octubre 2007) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP XREAP2007-09 Albalate, D. (PPRE-IREA) “Shifting death to their Alternatives: The case of Toll Motorways” (Octubre 2007) XREAP2007-10 Segarra-Blasco, A. (GRIT); Garcia-Quevedo, J. (IEB); Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (GRIT) “Barriers to innovation and public policy in catalonia” (Novembre 2007) XREAP2007-11 Bel, G. (PPRE-IREA); Foote, J. “Comparison of recent toll road concession transactions in the United States and France” (Novembre 2007) XREAP2007-12 Segarra-Blasco, A. (GRIT); “Innovation, R&D spillovers and productivity: the role of knowledge-intensive services” (Novembre 2007) XREAP2007-13 Bermúdez Morata, Ll. (RFA-IREA); Guillén Estany, M. (RFA-IREA), Solé Auró, A. (RFA-IREA) “Impacto de la inmigración sobre la esperanza de vida en salud y en discapacidad de la población española” (Novembre 2007) XREAP2007-14 Calaeys, P. (AQR-IREA); Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA), Suriñach, J. (AQR-IREA) “Fiscal sustainability across government tiers” (Desembre 2007) XREAP2007-15 Sánchez Hugalbe, A. (IEB) “Influencia de la inmigración en la elección escolar” (Desembre 2007) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP 2008 XREAP2008-01 Durán Weitkamp, C. (GRIT); Martín Bofarull, M. (GRIT) ; Pablo Martí, F. “Economic effects of road accessibility in the Pyrenees: User perspective” (Gener 2008) XREAP2008-02 Díaz-Serrano, L.; Stoyanova, A. P. (CREB) “The Causal Relationship between Individual’s Choice Behavior and Self-Reported Satisfaction: the Case of Residential Mobility in the EU” (Març 2008) XREAP2008-03 Matas, A. (GEAP); Raymond, J. L. (GEAP); Roig, J. L. (GEAP) “Car ownership and access to jobs in Spain” (Abril 2008) XREAP2008-04 Bel, G. (PPRE-IREA) ; Fageda, X. (PPRE-IREA) “Privatization and competition in the delivery of local services: An empirical examination of the dual market hypothesis” (Abril 2008) XREAP2008-05 Matas, A. (GEAP); Raymond, J. L. (GEAP); Roig, J. L. (GEAP) “Job accessibility and employment probability” (Maig 2008) XREAP2008-06 Basher, S. A.; Carrión, J. Ll. (AQR-IREA) Deconstructing Shocks and Persistence in OECD Real Exchange Rates (Juny 2008) XREAP2008-07 Sanromá, E. (IEB); Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA); Simón, H. Portabilidad del capital humano y asimilación de los inmigrantes. Evidencia para España (Juliol 2008) XREAP2008-08 Basher, S. A.; Carrión, J. Ll. (AQR-IREA) Price level convergence, purchasing power parity and multiple structural breaks: An application to US cities (Juliol 2008) XREAP2008-09 Bermúdez, Ll. (RFA-IREA) A priori ratemaking using bivariate poisson regression models (Juliol 2008) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP XREAP2008-10 Solé-Ollé, A. (IEB), Hortas Rico, M. (IEB) Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities (Novembre 2008) XREAP2008-11 Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (GRIT), Segarra-Blasco, A. (GRIT) Immigration and Firm Growth: Evidence from Spanish cities (Novembre 2008) XREAP2008-12 Duch-Brown, N. (IEB), García-Quevedo, J. (IEB), Montolio, D. (IEB) Assessing the assignation of public subsidies: Do the experts choose the most efficient R&D projects? (Novembre 2008) XREAP2008-13 Bilotkach, V., Fageda, X. (PPRE-IREA), Flores-Fillol, R. Scheduled service versus personal transportation: the role of distance (Desembre 2008) XREAP2008-14 Albalate, D. (PPRE-IREA), Gel, G. (PPRE-IREA) Tourism and urban transport: Holding demand pressure under supply constraints (Desembre 2008) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP 2009 XREAP2009-01 Calonge, S. (CREB); Tejada, O. “A theoretical and practical study on linear reforms of dual taxes” (Febrer 2009) XREAP2009-02 Albalate, D. (PPRE-IREA); Fernández-Villadangos, L. (PPRE-IREA) “Exploring Determinants of Urban Motorcycle Accident Severity: The Case of Barcelona” (Març 2009) XREAP2009-03 Borrell, J. R. (PPRE-IREA); Fernández-Villadangos, L. (PPRE-IREA) “Assessing excess profits from different entry regulations” (Abril 2009) XREAP2009-04 Sanromá, E. (IEB); Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA), Simon, H. “Los salarios de los inmigrantes en el mercado de trabajo español. ¿Importa el origen del capital humano?” (Abril 2009) XREAP2009-05 Jiménez, J. L.; Perdiguero, J. (PPRE-IREA) “(No)competition in the Spanish retailing gasoline market: a variance filter approach” (Maig 2009) XREAP2009-06 Álvarez-Albelo,C. D. (CREB), Manresa, A. (CREB), Pigem-Vigo, M. (CREB) “International trade as the sole engine of growth for an economy” (Juny 2009) XREAP2009-07 Callejón, M. (PPRE-IREA), Ortún V, M. “The Black Box of Business Dynamics” (Setembre 2009) XREAP2009-08 Lucena, A. (CREB) “The antecedents and innovation consequences of organizational search: empirical evidence for Spain” (Octubre 2009) XREAP2009-09 Domènech Campmajó, L. (PPRE-IREA) “Competition between TV Platforms” (Octubre 2009) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP XREAP2009-10 Solé-Auró, A. (RFA-IREA),Guillén, M. (RFA-IREA), Crimmins, E. M. “Health care utilization among immigrants and native-born populations in 11 European countries. Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe” (Octubre 2009) XREAP2009-11 Segarra, A. (GRIT), Teruel, M. (GRIT) “Small firms, growth and financial constraints” (Octubre 2009) XREAP2009-12 Matas, A. (GEAP), Raymond, J.Ll. (GEAP), Ruiz, A. (GEAP) “Traffic forecasts under uncertainty and capacity constraints” (Novembre 2009) XREAP2009-13 Sole-Ollé, A. (IEB) “Inter-regional redistribution through infrastructure investment: tactical or programmatic?” (Novembre 2009) XREAP2009-14 Del Barrio-Castro, T., García-Quevedo, J. (IEB) “The determinants of university patenting: Do incentives matter?” (Novembre 2009) XREAP2009-15 Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA), Suriñach, J. (AQR-IREA), Artís, M. (AQR-IREA) “Human capital spillovers, productivity and regional convergence in Spain” (Novembre 2009) XREAP2009-16 Álvarez-Albelo, C. D. (CREB), Hernández-Martín, R. “The commons and anti-commons problems in the tourism economy” (Desembre 2009) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP 2010 XREAP2010-01 García-López, M. A. (GEAP) “The Accessibility City. When Transport Infrastructure Matters in Urban Spatial Structure” (Febrer 2010) XREAP2010-02 García-Quevedo, J. (IEB), Mas-Verdú, F. (IEB), Polo-Otero, J. (IEB) “Which firms want PhDs? The effect of the university-industry relationship on the PhD labour market” (Març 2010) XREAP2010-03 Pitt, D., Guillén, M. (RFA-IREA) “An introduction to parametric and non-parametric models for bivariate positive insurance claim severity distributions” (Març 2010) XREAP2010-04 Bermúdez, Ll. (RFA-IREA), Karlis, D. “Modelling dependence in a ratemaking procedure with multivariate Poisson regression models” (Abril 2010) XREAP2010-05 Di Paolo, A. (IEB) “Parental education and family characteristics: educational opportunities across cohorts in Italy and Spain” (Maig 2010) XREAP2010-06 Simón, H. (IEB), Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA), Sanromá, E. (IEB) “Movilidad ocupacional de los inmigrantes en una economía de bajas cualificaciones. El caso de España” (Juny 2010) XREAP2010-07 Di Paolo, A. (GEAP & IEB), Raymond, J. Ll. (GEAP & IEB) “Language knowledge and earnings in Catalonia” (Juliol 2010) XREAP2010-08 Bolancé, C. (RFA-IREA), Alemany, R. (RFA-IREA), Guillén, M. (RFA-IREA) “Prediction of the economic cost of individual long-term care in the Spanish population” (Setembre 2010) XREAP2010-09 Di Paolo, A. (GEAP & IEB) “Knowledge of catalan, public/private sector choice and earnings: Evidence from a double sample selection model” (Setembre 2010) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP XREAP2010-10 Coad, A., Segarra, A. (GRIT), Teruel, M. (GRIT) “Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age?” (Setembre 2010) XREAP2010-11 Di Paolo, A. (GEAP & IEB), Raymond, J. Ll. (GEAP & IEB), Calero, J. (IEB) “Exploring educational mobility in Europe” (Octubre 2010) XREAP2010-12 Borrell, A. (GiM-IREA), Fernández-Villadangos, L. (GiM-IREA) “Clustering or scattering: the underlying reason for regulating distance among retail outlets” (Desembre 2010) XREAP2010-13 Di Paolo, A. (GEAP & IEB) “School composition effects in Spain” (Desembre 2010) XREAP2010-14 Fageda, X. (GiM-IREA), Flores-Fillol, R. “Technology, Business Models and Network Structure in the Airline Industry” (Desembre 2010) XREAP2010-15 Albalate, D. (GiM-IREA), Bel, G. (GiM-IREA), Fageda, X. (GiM-IREA) “Is it Redistribution or Centralization? On the Determinants of Government Investment in Infrastructure” (Desembre 2010) XREAP2010-16 Oppedisano, V., Turati, G. “What are the causes of educational inequalities and of their evolution over time in Europe? Evidence from PISA” (Desembre 2010) XREAP2010-17 Canova, L., Vaglio, A. “Why do educated mothers matter? A model of parental help” (Desembre 2010) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP 2011 XREAP2011-01 Fageda, X. (GiM-IREA), Perdiguero, J. (GiM-IREA) “An empirical analysis of a merger between a network and low-cost airlines” (Maig 2011) XREAP2011-02 Moreno-Torres, I. (ACCO, CRES & GiM-IREA) “What if there was a stronger pharmaceutical price competition in Spain? When regulation has a similar effect to collusion” (Maig 2011) XREAP2011-03 Miguélez, E. (AQR-IREA); Gómez-Miguélez, I. “Singling out individual inventors from patent data” (Maig 2011) XREAP2011-04 Moreno-Torres, I. (ACCO, CRES & GiM-IREA) “Generic drugs in Spain: price competition vs. moral hazard” (Maig 2011) XREAP2011-05 Nieto, S. (AQR-IREA), Ramos, R. (AQR-IREA) “¿Afecta la sobreeducación de los padres al rendimiento académico de sus hijos?” (Maig 2011) XREAP2011-06 Pitt, D., Guillén, M. (RFA-IREA), Bolancé, C. (RFA-IREA) “Estimation of Parametric and Nonparametric Models for Univariate Claim Severity Distributions - an approach using R” (Juny 2011) XREAP2011-07 Guillén, M. (RFA-IREA), Comas-Herrera, A. “How much risk is mitigated by LTC Insurance? A case study of the public system in Spain” (Juny 2011) XREAP2011-08 Ayuso, M. (RFA-IREA), Guillén, M. (RFA-IREA), Bolancé, C. (RFA-IREA) “Loss risk through fraud in car insurance” (Juny 2011) XREAP2011-09 Duch-Brown, N. (IEB), García-Quevedo, J. (IEB), Montolio, D. (IEB) “The link between public support and private R&D effort: What is the optimal subsidy?” (Juny 2011) SÈRIE DE DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA XREAP XREAP2011-10 Bermúdez, Ll. (RFA-IREA), Karlis, D. “Mixture of bivariate Poisson regression models with an application to insurance” (Juliol 2011) XREAP2011-11 Varela-Irimia, X-L. (GRIT) “Age effects, unobserved characteristics and hedonic price indexes: The Spanish car market in the 1990s” (Agost 2011) xreap@pcb.ub.es